2026-09-21T17:34:00Zhttps://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/requestoai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/728842026-06-06T01:06:05Zcom_1721.1_7582com_1721.1_7581col_1721.1_131023
Howard J. Herzog.
Cuellar, Amanda Dulcinea
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Technology and Policy Program.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division
Technology and Policy Program
2012-09-13T18:59:14Z
2012-09-13T18:59:14Z
2012
2012
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/72884
808381447
Thesis (S.M. in Technology and Policy)-- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division, Technology and Policy Program, 2012.
Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 85-89).
To date, biomass has not been a large source of power generation in the United States, despite the potential for greenhouse gas (GHG) benefits from displacing coal with carbon neutral biomass. In this thesis, the fuel cycle GHG emissions of power generation from both dedicated biomass power plants and coal power plants with biomass co-firing are quantified using a model based on Argonne National Laboratory's GREET model. The potential for negative emissions by adding a carbon capture and sequestration unit to the power plant is also analyzed. Finally an economic analysis of retrofitting existing coal plants to fire or co-fire biomass is conducted. If no land use change emissions are incurred during biomass production, co-firing as little as 5% biomass with coal can lead to a decrease in GHG emissions compared to coal alone. When a CCS unit is added to the modeled power plants, those co-firing 15% or higher biomass have negative emissions; essentially the plants capture CO₂ from the air. Nonetheless a carbon price of at least $52 per ton CO₂ equivalent is needed to make co-firing plants economically competitive with coal plants and a price of $71 per ton CO₂ equivalent is needed for co-firing plants with CCS. A policy analysis concludes that the lack of political support for biomass power generation stems from the lack of benefits directly related to current policy goals (e.g., energy security), high costs, and the perception that biomass firing with coal is not a 'clean' energy source. Nonetheless, this thesis demonstrates that the potential exists for immediate greenhouse gas emissions benefits from biomass power generation and, through technology development, for a future in which biomass is less costly to convert to power. In order to capture the benefits available today from biomass and to accelerate the development of preferred biomass feedstocks, policy measures are necessary to incentivize biomass power generation. Existing state policies and proposed rules at the federal level are inconsistent and do not provide the necessary incentives for biomass power systems. Two policy measures are proposed: first, a nationwide sustainable biomass certification system and second, policy measures that promote use of biomass that meets the certification criteria. These policies will result in both a supply of sustainable biomass and an increased demand for biomass power generation.
by Amanda Dulcinea Cuellar.
S.M. in Technology and Policy
94 p.
eng
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
M.I.T. theses are protected by
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
Engineering Systems Division.
Technology and Policy Program.
Plant power : the cost of using biomass for power generation and potential for decreased greenhouse gas emissions
Cost of using biomass for power generation and potential for decreased greenhouse gas emissions
Thesis
application/pdf
false
Publication
unknown
unknown
<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="106b9d2a-7ee6-4710-baed-ef1d47c93a71">
<Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type>
<Language>eng</Language>
<Title>Plant power : the cost of using biomass for power generation and potential for decreased greenhouse gas emissions</Title>
<Subtitle>Cost of using biomass for power generation and potential for decreased greenhouse gas emissions</Subtitle>
<PublishedIn>
<Publication>
</Publication>
</PublishedIn>
<PublicationDate>2012</PublicationDate>
<Authors>
<Author>
<DisplayName>Cuellar, Amanda Dulcinea</DisplayName>
<Affiliation>
<OrgUnit>
</OrgUnit>
</Affiliation>
</Author>
</Authors>
<Editors>
</Editors>
<Publishers>
<Publisher>
<DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology</DisplayName>
<OrgUnit />
</Publisher>
</Publishers>
<License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</License>
<Keyword>Engineering Systems Division.</Keyword>
<Keyword>Technology and Policy Program.</Keyword>
<Abstract>To date, biomass has not been a large source of power generation in the United States, despite the potential for greenhouse gas (GHG) benefits from displacing coal with carbon neutral biomass. In this thesis, the fuel cycle GHG emissions of power generation from both dedicated biomass power plants and coal power plants with biomass co-firing are quantified using a model based on Argonne National Laboratory's GREET model. The potential for negative emissions by adding a carbon capture and sequestration unit to the power plant is also analyzed. Finally an economic analysis of retrofitting existing coal plants to fire or co-fire biomass is conducted. If no land use change emissions are incurred during biomass production, co-firing as little as 5% biomass with coal can lead to a decrease in GHG emissions compared to coal alone. When a CCS unit is added to the modeled power plants, those co-firing 15% or higher biomass have negative emissions; essentially the plants capture CO₂ from the air. Nonetheless a carbon price of at least $52 per ton CO₂ equivalent is needed to make co-firing plants economically competitive with coal plants and a price of $71 per ton CO₂ equivalent is needed for co-firing plants with CCS. A policy analysis concludes that the lack of political support for biomass power generation stems from the lack of benefits directly related to current policy goals (e.g., energy security), high costs, and the perception that biomass firing with coal is not a 'clean' energy source. Nonetheless, this thesis demonstrates that the potential exists for immediate greenhouse gas emissions benefits from biomass power generation and, through technology development, for a future in which biomass is less costly to convert to power. In order to capture the benefits available today from biomass and to accelerate the development of preferred biomass feedstocks, policy measures are necessary to incentivize biomass power generation. Existing state policies and proposed rules at the federal level are inconsistent and do not provide the necessary incentives for biomass power systems. Two policy measures are proposed: first, a nationwide sustainable biomass certification system and second, policy measures that promote use of biomass that meets the certification criteria. These policies will result in both a supply of sustainable biomass and an increased demand for biomass power generation.</Abstract>
<Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right"
>
</Access>
</Publication>