<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-19T08:50:53Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/72887" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/72887</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-13T07:54:52Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Michael A. Cusumano.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Tanaka, Jin, M.B.A. Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Sloan School of Management.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Sloan School of Management</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2012-09-13T18:59:29Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2012-09-13T18:59:29Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2012</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2012</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/72887</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">808382690</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis (M.B.A.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2012.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (p. 68-70).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">Among several key factors affecting new technology innovation, two important ones that are sometimes disturbed by M&amp;A are long-term p-ans and the commitment of the acquired firm's management team. M&amp;A led by technology companies are most often motivated by their need for certain technology, and most mergers, the strategies to grow the new company are quite clear. However, when M&amp;A are led by financial investors or non-technology-based firms like private equity or trading and investment companies, the post-merger growth strategy to develop and manage the acquired firm's technology is often not well thought out. This is generally related to their lack of capability of managing of technology which can disturb long-term R&amp;D work. However, some M&amp;A carried out by private equity or trading and investment company, have had positive results. This study compares three M&amp;A cases of trading and investment companies, private equity, and technology-based companies of technology-based firms. Comparisons are made based on financial figures, the ability to manage technology, and the success of the post-merger integration process. This study concludes with three suggestions, continuous synergy creation from parent company is essential for sustainable growth, corporate culture and business synergy must be considered carefully during the integration process, and retention of R&amp;D employees and maintaining a technology-oriented corporate culture and environment are very critical for firm's new technology innovation.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Jin Tanaka.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">M.B.A.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">70 p.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by 
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but 
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written 
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Sloan School of Management.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Acquisition and management of technology-based firms in a trading and investment company</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="335b9a34-4fa9-434a-9dfc-c5744dd38762">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Acquisition and management of technology-based firms in a trading and investment company&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2012&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Tanaka, Jin, M.B.A. Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Sloan School of Management.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>Among several key factors affecting new technology innovation, two important ones that are sometimes disturbed by M&amp;amp;A are long-term p-ans and the commitment of the acquired firm&amp;apos;s management team. M&amp;amp;A led by technology companies are most often motivated by their need for certain technology, and most mergers, the strategies to grow the new company are quite clear. However, when M&amp;amp;A are led by financial investors or non-technology-based firms like private equity or trading and investment companies, the post-merger growth strategy to develop and manage the acquired firm&amp;apos;s technology is often not well thought out. This is generally related to their lack of capability of managing of technology which can disturb long-term R&amp;amp;D work. However, some M&amp;amp;A carried out by private equity or trading and investment company, have had positive results. This study compares three M&amp;amp;A cases of trading and investment companies, private equity, and technology-based companies of technology-based firms. Comparisons are made based on financial figures, the ability to manage technology, and the success of the post-merger integration process. This study concludes with three suggestions, continuous synergy creation from parent company is essential for sustainable growth, corporate culture and business synergy must be considered carefully during the integration process, and retention of R&amp;amp;D employees and maintaining a technology-oriented corporate culture and environment are very critical for firm&amp;apos;s new technology innovation.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>