<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-20T04:16:04Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/72888" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/72888</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-13T07:54:52Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Andrew Lo and John Van Maanen.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Swarna, Kailash, 1963-</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Sloan School of Management.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Sloan School of Management</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2012-09-13T18:59:34Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2012-09-13T18:59:34Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2012</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2012</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/72888</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">808382883</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis (M.B.A.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2012.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (p. 98-102).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">For several decades, the ascendancy of the Pharma &amp; Biotech sector was largely driven by favorable macro-economic conditions combined with an astonishing level of innovation and a clear focus on addressing unmet medical needs. Significant R&amp;D investments led to innovative drugs that changed clinical practice across multiple illnesses and contributed to an overall rise in life expectancy around the world. Unfortunately, this trend has not continued. Since the mid-90s', the approval of novel drugs has plummeted despite record levels of R&amp;D investment. It is estimated that between 2000 and 2010, the top 10 global Pharma and Biotech companies have collectively invested over $500 Billion in R&amp;D. In the same period, only about 150 novel drugs entered the market. This is partly explained by the fact that quick-wins have been harvested, and that further progress in treating grievous illness is harder to achieve. This is compounded by increasing concerns about the longterm safety of drugs and the conservative regulatory climate that has prevailed since 2000. In this challenging regulatory and cost environment, the basic economic model of the industry is now being questioned. In this work I review the recent financial performance of ten major global pharmaceutical companies, and the challenges faced by the industry in moving from a deterministic, blockbuster era to a more stochastic era defined by multiple unknowns.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Kailash Swarna.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">M.B.A.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">102 p.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by 
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but 
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written 
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Sloan School of Management.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">The evaluation of system-wide financial incentives in pipeline decisions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry : the paradox of R&amp;D spend Vs. new drug approvals</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="b3b72828-f552-4db5-a9f8-ecb5fc1a7ffe">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>The evaluation of system-wide financial incentives in pipeline decisions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry : the paradox of R&amp;amp;D spend Vs. new drug approvals&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2012&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Swarna, Kailash, 1963-&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Sloan School of Management.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>For several decades, the ascendancy of the Pharma &amp;amp; Biotech sector was largely driven by favorable macro-economic conditions combined with an astonishing level of innovation and a clear focus on addressing unmet medical needs. Significant R&amp;amp;D investments led to innovative drugs that changed clinical practice across multiple illnesses and contributed to an overall rise in life expectancy around the world. Unfortunately, this trend has not continued. Since the mid-90s&amp;apos;, the approval of novel drugs has plummeted despite record levels of R&amp;amp;D investment. It is estimated that between 2000 and 2010, the top 10 global Pharma and Biotech companies have collectively invested over $500 Billion in R&amp;amp;D. In the same period, only about 150 novel drugs entered the market. This is partly explained by the fact that quick-wins have been harvested, and that further progress in treating grievous illness is harder to achieve. This is compounded by increasing concerns about the longterm safety of drugs and the conservative regulatory climate that has prevailed since 2000. In this challenging regulatory and cost environment, the basic economic model of the industry is now being questioned. In this work I review the recent financial performance of ten major global pharmaceutical companies, and the challenges faced by the industry in moving from a deterministic, blockbuster era to a more stochastic era defined by multiple unknowns.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>