2026-09-25T11:32:25Zhttps://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/requestoai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/750042026-06-06T01:04:44Zcom_1721.1_7582com_1721.1_7581col_1721.1_131023
N. John Habraken.
Hille, R. Thomas
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture
n-us-ca
2012-11-21T15:47:00Z
2012-11-21T15:47:00Z
1982
1982
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/75004
09040993
Thesis (M.S. and M. Arch.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 1982.
MICROFICHE COPY AVAILABLE IN ARCHIVES AND ROTCH.
This study is an exploration of the relationship between understanding and transforming an architectural context. The question asked is; What formal lessons can be learned from an existing context? The discussion is limited to issues of form and rule structure, particularly in reference to the zone of exchange between outside/inside and public/private. The Victorian residential form in San Francisco is used as a case study. There are four parts to the study: 1. An observational study of existing residential facade zones which consists of measured drawings in plan and elevation of a four block area in San Francisco. 2. A design projection of a support infill building based on intuitive interpretation of the observed context. 3. A methodological analysis of the context to derive the implicit generating rules and principles. 4. Based on a comparison of the analysis and projection, a discussion of the lessons to be learned from the context.
by R. Thomas Hille.
M.S.
M.Arch.
v, 117 p. (12 folded)
eng
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
M.I.T. theses are protected by
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
Architecture.
Architecture, Victorian California San Francisco
Architecture, Domestic California San Francisco
Understanding and transforming what's there : a look at the formal rule structure of the residential facade zone in Victorian San Francisco
Thesis
application/pdf
false
Publication
unknown
unknown
<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="c2afd8e4-2522-47ea-9f50-f79586b9354a">
<Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type>
<Language>eng</Language>
<Title>Understanding and transforming what's there : a look at the formal rule structure of the residential facade zone in Victorian San Francisco</Title>
<PublishedIn>
<Publication>
</Publication>
</PublishedIn>
<PublicationDate>1982</PublicationDate>
<Authors>
<Author>
<DisplayName>Hille, R. Thomas</DisplayName>
<Affiliation>
<OrgUnit>
</OrgUnit>
</Affiliation>
</Author>
</Authors>
<Editors>
</Editors>
<Publishers>
<Publisher>
<DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology</DisplayName>
<OrgUnit />
</Publisher>
</Publishers>
<License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</License>
<Keyword>Architecture.</Keyword>
<Abstract>This study is an exploration of the relationship between understanding and transforming an architectural context. The question asked is; What formal lessons can be learned from an existing context? The discussion is limited to issues of form and rule structure, particularly in reference to the zone of exchange between outside/inside and public/private. The Victorian residential form in San Francisco is used as a case study. There are four parts to the study: 1. An observational study of existing residential facade zones which consists of measured drawings in plan and elevation of a four block area in San Francisco. 2. A design projection of a support infill building based on intuitive interpretation of the observed context. 3. A methodological analysis of the context to derive the implicit generating rules and principles. 4. Based on a comparison of the analysis and projection, a discussion of the lessons to be learned from the context.</Abstract>
<Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right"
>
</Access>
</Publication>