<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-20T03:26:37Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/76961" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/76961</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-13T07:54:37Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131024</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Michael Golay.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Wei, Elizabeth J. (Elizabeth Jay)</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Nuclear Science and Engineering.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="coverage" qualifier="spatial" lang="en_US">a-ja---</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2013-02-14T15:32:32Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2013-02-14T15:32:32Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2012</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/76961</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">824736280</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis (S.B.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Nuclear Science and Engineering, 2012.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">"June 2012." Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (p. 50-55).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">The danger of high, acute doses of radiation is well documented, but the effects of low-dose radiation below 100 mSv is still heavily debated. Four theories concerning the effects of lowdose radiation are presented here: supra-linearity, linear-no-threshold (LNT), threshold, and hormesis. The available evidence for and against these theories, which falls into the categories of either epidemiological studies, in vitro cell experiments, or in vivo animal experiments, includes studies which support each of the four theories. Currently, all radiation risk estimates are based on an LNT interpretation of the life span study (LSS) of atomic bomb survivors in Japan. However, while this pattern is undisputed at high doses, this linear extrapolation of risk to low doses is challenged by many recent experiments involving cell mechanisms and animal models, and there is also high uncertainty involved in estimating risk using only epidemiological studies.. Variations have also been observed depending on dose-rate, the organ at risk, and other factors for which the current data cannot adequately account. While the evidence is still inconclusive, the existence of a threshold in human responses to low-dose radiation would drastically alter current guidelines, such as those currently restricting many people from returning to their hometowna in Fukushima, Japan. Thus, it is important to further investigate these low*dose responses in order to more fully describe the risks and to create more accurate radiation guidelines.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Elizabeth J. Wei.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">S.B.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">55 p.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by 
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but 
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written 
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Nuclear Science and Engineering.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">An evaluation of theories concerning the health effects of low-dose radiation exposures</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="2473a78e-12a7-4566-aa59-9b3045090ee0">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>An evaluation of theories concerning the health effects of low-dose radiation exposures&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2012&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Wei, Elizabeth J. (Elizabeth Jay)&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Nuclear Science and Engineering.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>The danger of high, acute doses of radiation is well documented, but the effects of low-dose radiation below 100 mSv is still heavily debated. Four theories concerning the effects of lowdose radiation are presented here: supra-linearity, linear-no-threshold (LNT), threshold, and hormesis. The available evidence for and against these theories, which falls into the categories of either epidemiological studies, in vitro cell experiments, or in vivo animal experiments, includes studies which support each of the four theories. Currently, all radiation risk estimates are based on an LNT interpretation of the life span study (LSS) of atomic bomb survivors in Japan. However, while this pattern is undisputed at high doses, this linear extrapolation of risk to low doses is challenged by many recent experiments involving cell mechanisms and animal models, and there is also high uncertainty involved in estimating risk using only epidemiological studies.. Variations have also been observed depending on dose-rate, the organ at risk, and other factors for which the current data cannot adequately account. While the evidence is still inconclusive, the existence of a threshold in human responses to low-dose radiation would drastically alter current guidelines, such as those currently restricting many people from returning to their hometowna in Fukushima, Japan. Thus, it is important to further investigate these low*dose responses in order to more fully describe the risks and to create more accurate radiation guidelines.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>