<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-18T18:38:44Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/77021" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/77021</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-13T07:54:29Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Tommy Li and Hal Abelson.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Jiang, Alexandra</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2013-02-14T15:39:10Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2013-02-14T15:39:10Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2012</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2012</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/77021</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">825770619</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis (M. Eng.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2012.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (p. 43-44).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">For NetApp products to be the best in the market, NetApp has to make the correct technology decisions to insure it leads in innovation. In this thesis, I focus on a product called NetApp Unified Manager, examining whether HTML5 satisfies its needs. I evaluate NetApp from a user's perspective using four criteria: data visualization and customization, platform, NetApp's special needs, and interoperability. From researching about these criteria, I evaluate the best decision for NetApp OnCommand's user experience, moving forward. I compare Adobe Flash based and HTML5 based data visualizations and reach several conclusions: their functionalities are comparable; HTML5 is completely capable of representing large amounts of data; HTML5 does not have all the features that Adobe Flash has on all browsers, but its disadvantages will decrease over time. Additionally, I assess NetApp's inclination toward mobile development and decide that running an application native to the browser is best because mobile application development is in the future. Accordingly, I recommend that NetApp migrate their applications to HTML5. I have made three main contributions in this thesis: I have framed a method for researching for and writing a recommendation. I have identified four criteria on which to assess NetApp's needs, emphasizing data visualizations. Finally, I have argued that, for NetApp, HTML5 is superior to Flash in the advantages it brings now.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Alexandra Jiang.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">M.Eng.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">47 p.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by 
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but 
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written 
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">HTML5 vs. Adobe Flash : from the end user standpoint</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" qualifier="alternative" lang="en_US">HyperText Markup Language5 versus Adobe Flash</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="ba2850fc-7881-4aaf-846f-a4403cf003ab">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>HTML5 vs. Adobe Flash : from the end user standpoint&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;Subtitle>HyperText Markup Language5 versus Adobe Flash&lt;/Subtitle>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2012&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Jiang, Alexandra&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>For NetApp products to be the best in the market, NetApp has to make the correct technology decisions to insure it leads in innovation. In this thesis, I focus on a product called NetApp Unified Manager, examining whether HTML5 satisfies its needs. I evaluate NetApp from a user&amp;apos;s perspective using four criteria: data visualization and customization, platform, NetApp&amp;apos;s special needs, and interoperability. From researching about these criteria, I evaluate the best decision for NetApp OnCommand&amp;apos;s user experience, moving forward. I compare Adobe Flash based and HTML5 based data visualizations and reach several conclusions: their functionalities are comparable; HTML5 is completely capable of representing large amounts of data; HTML5 does not have all the features that Adobe Flash has on all browsers, but its disadvantages will decrease over time. Additionally, I assess NetApp&amp;apos;s inclination toward mobile development and decide that running an application native to the browser is best because mobile application development is in the future. Accordingly, I recommend that NetApp migrate their applications to HTML5. I have made three main contributions in this thesis: I have framed a method for researching for and writing a recommendation. I have identified four criteria on which to assess NetApp&amp;apos;s needs, emphasizing data visualizations. Finally, I have argued that, for NetApp, HTML5 is superior to Flash in the advantages it brings now.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>