<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-20T12:27:22Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/78082" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/78082</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-13T07:54:12Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">David Friedman.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Taylor, Rives Trau</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2013-03-28T18:00:51Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2013-03-28T18:00:51Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">1988</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">1988</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/78082</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">18902866</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis (M.S.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 1988.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (leaves 256-268).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">The architectural form of the American college campus is shaped by broader cultural and philosophical factors which themselves are based on the notion of an architectural environment able to control the intellectual growth of the individual. This thesis investigates the artistic and philosophical preconceptions of the profession of architecture during the American period of 1880 to 1920 using the college campus of Carnegie-Mellon University and the work o f Henry Hornbostel as the means of investigation. The architecture of the campus reflected the values and ideals of a diverse number of parties who were all interested in improving society along a "progressive" but conservative ideology. Their tools of reform were the Fine Arts and a system of higher education. They based this education on both a utilitarian pragmatism and a hegemony of cultural ideals. As they affect the campus form I will investigate the social ideals and the means to achieve those ideals as advocated by the patron Andrew Carnegie, by his lieutenants in Pittsburgh, by the city fathers of Pittsburgh, by the architectural profession (both the practicing and educational branches), by the wider academic community, and by the architect himself. This thesis investigates the notion of the Institutional Imperative in America at the turn of the century so to understand both the evolution of American civic architecture and the process whereby the individual architect made his formal decisions with respect to his larger philosophies and national context.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Rives Trau Taylor.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">M.S.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">268 leaves</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by 
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but 
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written 
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Architecture.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" qualifier="ddc" lang="en_US">727.3</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">The American college and its architecture : an institutional imperative</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" qualifier="alternative" lang="en_US">College and its architecture, The American</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="6c534c85-26cd-4f9d-9a74-12f4d6fac2ef">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>The American college and its architecture : an institutional imperative&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;Subtitle>College and its architecture, The American&lt;/Subtitle>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>1988&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Taylor, Rives Trau&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Architecture.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>The architectural form of the American college campus is shaped by broader cultural and philosophical factors which themselves are based on the notion of an architectural environment able to control the intellectual growth of the individual. This thesis investigates the artistic and philosophical preconceptions of the profession of architecture during the American period of 1880 to 1920 using the college campus of Carnegie-Mellon University and the work o f Henry Hornbostel as the means of investigation. The architecture of the campus reflected the values and ideals of a diverse number of parties who were all interested in improving society along a &amp;quot;progressive&amp;quot; but conservative ideology. Their tools of reform were the Fine Arts and a system of higher education. They based this education on both a utilitarian pragmatism and a hegemony of cultural ideals. As they affect the campus form I will investigate the social ideals and the means to achieve those ideals as advocated by the patron Andrew Carnegie, by his lieutenants in Pittsburgh, by the city fathers of Pittsburgh, by the architectural profession (both the practicing and educational branches), by the wider academic community, and by the architect himself. This thesis investigates the notion of the Institutional Imperative in America at the turn of the century so to understand both the evolution of American civic architecture and the process whereby the individual architect made his formal decisions with respect to his larger philosophies and national context.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>