2026-09-19T02:42:04Zhttps://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/requestoai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/837212022-01-13T07:54:05Zcom_1721.1_7582com_1721.1_7581col_1721.1_131024
Amos Winter.
Isava, Monica
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
2014-01-09T19:48:20Z
2014-01-09T19:48:20Z
2013
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83721
864438816
Thesis (S.B.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2013.
Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (page 27).
The Atlantic razor clam (Ensis directus) burrows into soil by contracting its valves in a pattern that fluidizes the particles around it. In this way, it uses an order of magnitude less energy to dig to its burrowing depth than would be expected if it were moving through static soil. This technology is a mechanically simple solution to reduce energy requirements in applications such as anchoring and underwater pipe installation. RoboClam is a robot that imitates the movements of Ensis and has achieved localized fluidization in environments similar to that of the animal. This paper tests the theoretical timescale limits for running RoboClam while still achieving the soil fluidization that Ensis achieves. Needle valves were used on the robot's pneumatic control system to vary its expansion and contraction times in a series of tests, then each test was analyzed to determine to what extent soil fluidization occurred. It was found that the theoretical minimum contraction time is an appropriate boundary and the theoretical maximum contraction time is a loose boundary on tests that will result in soil fluidization. However, these conclusions came from a limited number of tests, so further testing is necessary to confirm these results.
by Monica Isava.
S.B.
27 pages
eng
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
M.I.T. theses are protected by
copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but
reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written
permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
Mechanical Engineering.
Exploring the timescale limitations of RoboClam : a biologically inspired burrowing robot
Biologically inspired burrowing robot
Thesis
application/pdf
false
Publication
unknown
unknown
<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="c938045b-7ce8-4d9c-9a78-c1b73729c446">
<Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type>
<Language>eng</Language>
<Title>Exploring the timescale limitations of RoboClam : a biologically inspired burrowing robot</Title>
<Subtitle>Biologically inspired burrowing robot</Subtitle>
<PublishedIn>
<Publication>
</Publication>
</PublishedIn>
<PublicationDate>2013</PublicationDate>
<Authors>
<Author>
<DisplayName>Isava, Monica</DisplayName>
<Affiliation>
<OrgUnit>
</OrgUnit>
</Affiliation>
</Author>
</Authors>
<Editors>
</Editors>
<Publishers>
<Publisher>
<DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology</DisplayName>
<OrgUnit />
</Publisher>
</Publishers>
<License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</License>
<Keyword>Mechanical Engineering.</Keyword>
<Abstract>The Atlantic razor clam (Ensis directus) burrows into soil by contracting its valves in a pattern that fluidizes the particles around it. In this way, it uses an order of magnitude less energy to dig to its burrowing depth than would be expected if it were moving through static soil. This technology is a mechanically simple solution to reduce energy requirements in applications such as anchoring and underwater pipe installation. RoboClam is a robot that imitates the movements of Ensis and has achieved localized fluidization in environments similar to that of the animal. This paper tests the theoretical timescale limits for running RoboClam while still achieving the soil fluidization that Ensis achieves. Needle valves were used on the robot's pneumatic control system to vary its expansion and contraction times in a series of tests, then each test was analyzed to determine to what extent soil fluidization occurred. It was found that the theoretical minimum contraction time is an appropriate boundary and the theoretical maximum contraction time is a loose boundary on tests that will result in soil fluidization. However, these conclusions came from a limited number of tests, so further testing is necessary to confirm these results.</Abstract>
<Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right"
>
</Access>
</Publication>