<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-18T20:09:48Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/8613" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/8613</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-13T07:54:23Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Jerome J. Connor.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">De Rojas, Ricardo R. (Ricardo Rafael De Rojas Pando), 1978-</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2005-08-23T21:43:15Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2005-08-23T21:43:15Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2001</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2001</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/8613</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">49407885</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis (M.Eng.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2001.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (leaves 55-56).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">Due to life-cycle costs considerations, the Federal Highway Administration has required that all their new bridge structures have a service life of more than 75 years. The practical use of adequate concrete cover, low water/cement ratio, and corrosion inhibitors and admixtures are not enough to satisfy this requirement. Corrosion still affects the reinforcing steel through the diffusion of chlorides. The steel reinforcement, the last line of defense, has to be addressed in order to protect reinforced concrete structures from corrosion and thus extend the service life. Today, new cost-effective technology has surfaced to address the problem. Nuovinox Stainless-steel clad reinforcing bars, fusion bonded epoxy (3M Skotchkot 426) and the recent Dual Phase Ferritic Martensitic bars (MMFXI/II steels) have emerged. This study describes each new reinforcement protection technology and compares them through cost, service life, availability and resistance considerations. The comparisons show that stainless-steel clad bars have the advantage over all other new reinforcement types. The fusion bonded epoxy closely followed while the MMFX steel, because of its lack of exposure, came in last. A prudent combination of the standard corrosion protection methods with these new technologies in steel reinforcement can potentially provide a cost-effective service of more than 75 years to a structure.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Ricardo R. De Rojas.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">M.Eng.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">57 leaves</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent">4280444 bytes</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent">4280203 bytes</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Civil and Environmental Engineering.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">New developments in steel reinforcement protection from corrosion</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="09ed98cc-d24e-42be-bc18-f0734815a960">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>New developments in steel reinforcement protection from corrosion&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2001&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>De Rojas, Ricardo R. (Ricardo Rafael De Rojas Pando), 1978-&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Civil and Environmental Engineering.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>Due to life-cycle costs considerations, the Federal Highway Administration has required that all their new bridge structures have a service life of more than 75 years. The practical use of adequate concrete cover, low water/cement ratio, and corrosion inhibitors and admixtures are not enough to satisfy this requirement. Corrosion still affects the reinforcing steel through the diffusion of chlorides. The steel reinforcement, the last line of defense, has to be addressed in order to protect reinforced concrete structures from corrosion and thus extend the service life. Today, new cost-effective technology has surfaced to address the problem. Nuovinox Stainless-steel clad reinforcing bars, fusion bonded epoxy (3M Skotchkot 426) and the recent Dual Phase Ferritic Martensitic bars (MMFXI/II steels) have emerged. This study describes each new reinforcement protection technology and compares them through cost, service life, availability and resistance considerations. The comparisons show that stainless-steel clad bars have the advantage over all other new reinforcement types. The fusion bonded epoxy closely followed while the MMFX steel, because of its lack of exposure, came in last. A prudent combination of the standard corrosion protection methods with these new technologies in steel reinforcement can potentially provide a cost-effective service of more than 75 years to a structure.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>