<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-20T02:30:15Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/86261" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/86261</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-13T07:54:52Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Ezra Zuckerman.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Ha, Jae-Kyung</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Sloan School of Management.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Sloan School of Management</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2014-04-25T15:47:23Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2014-04-25T15:47:23Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2013</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2013</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/86261</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">874129829</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis: S.M. in Management Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2013.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (pages 35-38).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">A number of studies suggest that people may care about the process by which a product is made, even when it is not associated with the quality of the product. A common example of this preference is "production-process conservatism," whereby consumers prefer products made via traditional practices rather than those made via new practices. However, it is not clear what mechanism drives such conservatism and it is difficult to rule out the possibility that it is due to differences in product quality. We focus on the context of diamond jewelry, where consumers have generally been resistant to diamonds that are identical to mined diamonds but are produced in a laboratory. We argue that this resistance derives from the use of a product in the performance of a social ritual, where deviation from the traditional rules of the ritual carries the risk that one will signal a lack of commitment or cultural competence. In particular, we expect consumers to be more resistant to lab-created diamonds when they buy diamond jewelry for an engagement gift, compared to when they buy diamond jewelry for a more routine gift. Our hypothesis is tested in a series of online experiments. The experiments provide evidence for our argument, and, in particular, females who ever married show the strongest resistance to labcreated diamonds in a ritual condition, compared to when they are in a gift-giving condition. We conclude by discussing theoretical implications of these findings and the mechanism underlying ritual reinforcement for future research. Keywords: production process, ritual, risk, symbol, engagement, lab-created diamond.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Jae-Kyung Ha.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">S.M. in Management Research</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">44 pages</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Sloan School of Management.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Can a girl's best friend be born in a lab? the role of ritual in production process conservatism</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" qualifier="alternative" lang="en_US">Role of ritual in production process conservatism</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="f77ceeaf-4b1e-4ab6-ac1d-5be9d23c7c7e">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Can a girl&amp;apos;s best friend be born in a lab? the role of ritual in production process conservatism&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;Subtitle>Role of ritual in production process conservatism&lt;/Subtitle>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2013&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Ha, Jae-Kyung&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Sloan School of Management.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>A number of studies suggest that people may care about the process by which a product is made, even when it is not associated with the quality of the product. A common example of this preference is &amp;quot;production-process conservatism,&amp;quot; whereby consumers prefer products made via traditional practices rather than those made via new practices. However, it is not clear what mechanism drives such conservatism and it is difficult to rule out the possibility that it is due to differences in product quality. We focus on the context of diamond jewelry, where consumers have generally been resistant to diamonds that are identical to mined diamonds but are produced in a laboratory. We argue that this resistance derives from the use of a product in the performance of a social ritual, where deviation from the traditional rules of the ritual carries the risk that one will signal a lack of commitment or cultural competence. In particular, we expect consumers to be more resistant to lab-created diamonds when they buy diamond jewelry for an engagement gift, compared to when they buy diamond jewelry for a more routine gift. Our hypothesis is tested in a series of online experiments. The experiments provide evidence for our argument, and, in particular, females who ever married show the strongest resistance to labcreated diamonds in a ritual condition, compared to when they are in a gift-giving condition. We conclude by discussing theoretical implications of these findings and the mechanism underlying ritual reinforcement for future research. Keywords: production process, ritual, risk, symbol, engagement, lab-created diamond.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>