<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-19T18:47:34Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/88401" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/88401</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-31T21:07:21Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">David R. Wallace.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Mekler, Jeffrey S</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Technology and Policy Program</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2014-07-11T21:09:07Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2014-07-11T21:09:07Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2014</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2014</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/88401</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">881821705</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis: S.M. in Technology and Policy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division, Technology and Policy Program, 2014.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2014.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (pages 102-107).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">Crowdsourcing creative work - the process of outsourcing a creative task to a large online community or crowd - has grown in popularity over the last decade and is now considered a serious design strategy. However, there has been little research examining how the composition of the crowd and the nature of the crowd's interactions affect the crowd's creative capacity. Building upon related findings in the group creativity literature, this thesis examines the effects social diversity, cognitive diversity, and communication capability on the crowd's ability to generate high quality design concepts. A design challenge to "reimagine the public restroom experience" was developed, and challenge participants were placed into crowds with varying levels of diversity and communication capability. Findings from the study show that social diversity and cognitive diversity had positive effects on the quality of participants' concepts. Furthermore, diverse, communication-capable crowds generated higher quality concepts than participants in crowds with no communication capability, but low diversity, communication-capable crowds performed worse than crowds with no communication capability. These findings suggest that designers of CCW platforms should consider the diversity of the crowd when deciding how much communication capability to build into crowdsourcing platforms. Future work is needed to investigate the generalizability of these findings for different problem types.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Jeffrey S. Mekler.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">S.M. in Technology and Policy</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">S.M.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">125 pages</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Engineering Systems Division.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Technology and Policy Program.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Mechanical Engineering.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">CrowdConcept : assessing the crowd's creative capacity</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" qualifier="alternative" lang="en_US">Assessing the crowd's creative capacity</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="e633fd51-69f4-4376-a5ea-301e26ce5b4f">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>CrowdConcept : assessing the crowd&amp;apos;s creative capacity&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;Subtitle>Assessing the crowd&amp;apos;s creative capacity&lt;/Subtitle>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2014&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Mekler, Jeffrey S&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Engineering Systems Division.&lt;/Keyword>
    &lt;Keyword>Technology and Policy Program.&lt;/Keyword>
    &lt;Keyword>Mechanical Engineering.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>Crowdsourcing creative work - the process of outsourcing a creative task to a large online community or crowd - has grown in popularity over the last decade and is now considered a serious design strategy. However, there has been little research examining how the composition of the crowd and the nature of the crowd&amp;apos;s interactions affect the crowd&amp;apos;s creative capacity. Building upon related findings in the group creativity literature, this thesis examines the effects social diversity, cognitive diversity, and communication capability on the crowd&amp;apos;s ability to generate high quality design concepts. A design challenge to &amp;quot;reimagine the public restroom experience&amp;quot; was developed, and challenge participants were placed into crowds with varying levels of diversity and communication capability. Findings from the study show that social diversity and cognitive diversity had positive effects on the quality of participants&amp;apos; concepts. Furthermore, diverse, communication-capable crowds generated higher quality concepts than participants in crowds with no communication capability, but low diversity, communication-capable crowds performed worse than crowds with no communication capability. These findings suggest that designers of CCW platforms should consider the diversity of the crowd when deciding how much communication capability to build into crowdsourcing platforms. Future work is needed to investigate the generalizability of these findings for different problem types.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>