<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-26T00:35:54Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/8872" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/8872</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-31T17:06:07Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Howard J. Herzog.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">David, Jérémy, 1976-</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Technology and Policy Program.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Technology and Policy Program</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2005-08-23T15:59:47Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2005-08-23T15:59:47Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2000</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2000</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/8872</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">48806173</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Technology and Policy Program, 2000.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (leaves 76-78).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">The greatest contribution to greenhouse gas emissions is the burning of fossil fuels, which releases nearly six billion tons of carbon per year into the atmosphere. These fuels will continue to be used well into the 21st century, although there is a urgent need to manage a sustainable economic development. Since power plants are the largest point sources of CO 2 emissions, capturing the carbon dioxide at power plants and sequestering it has been suggested. This approach would be complementary to the current strategics that aim at reducing greenhouse gas emissions by improving the energy efficiency and by increasing the use of non-fossil energy resources. However, a major barrier to CO2 capture and sequestration is Its cost. This thesis presents the results of a detailed analysis of costs associated with today's technology for CO2 separation and capture at three types of power plants: Integrated Gasification Combined Cycles (IGCC), coal-fired simple cycles (Pulnrized Coal, PC), and natural gas-fired combined cycles (Natural Gas Combined Cycles, NGCC). The analysis is based on studies from the literature that are reviewed and adjusted to a common economic basts. A composite cost model is then developed, and a sensitivity analysts performed to identify the cost-drivers of the capture. Finally, the economics at the three types of power plants arc predicted for a 10-year horizon, and the competitiveness of CO2 separation technologies under a specific policy scenario arc discussed.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Jérémy David.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">S.M.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">84 leaves</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent">5341656 bytes</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent">5341414 bytes</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Technology and Policy Program.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Economic evaluation of leading technology options for sequestration of carbon dioxide</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="06e2047a-9d63-4b90-8572-b33bb97eec15">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Economic evaluation of leading technology options for sequestration of carbon dioxide&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2000&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>David, Jérémy, 1976-&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Technology and Policy Program.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>The greatest contribution to greenhouse gas emissions is the burning of fossil fuels, which releases nearly six billion tons of carbon per year into the atmosphere. These fuels will continue to be used well into the 21st century, although there is a urgent need to manage a sustainable economic development. Since power plants are the largest point sources of CO 2 emissions, capturing the carbon dioxide at power plants and sequestering it has been suggested. This approach would be complementary to the current strategics that aim at reducing greenhouse gas emissions by improving the energy efficiency and by increasing the use of non-fossil energy resources. However, a major barrier to CO2 capture and sequestration is Its cost. This thesis presents the results of a detailed analysis of costs associated with today&amp;apos;s technology for CO2 separation and capture at three types of power plants: Integrated Gasification Combined Cycles (IGCC), coal-fired simple cycles (Pulnrized Coal, PC), and natural gas-fired combined cycles (Natural Gas Combined Cycles, NGCC). The analysis is based on studies from the literature that are reviewed and adjusted to a common economic basts. A composite cost model is then developed, and a sensitivity analysts performed to identify the cost-drivers of the capture. Finally, the economics at the three types of power plants arc predicted for a 10-year horizon, and the competitiveness of CO2 separation technologies under a specific policy scenario arc discussed.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>