2026-09-23T23:30:30Zhttps://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/requestoai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/900442022-01-31T16:23:52Zcom_1721.1_7582com_1721.1_7581col_1721.1_131023
Donald R. Lessard.
Garćia Palma, Rodrigo Salvador
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Technology and Policy Program.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division
Technology and Policy Program
2014-09-19T21:36:23Z
2014-09-19T21:36:23Z
2014
2014
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/90044
890139708
Thesis: S.M. in Technology and Policy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division, Technology and Policy Program, 2014.
Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 161-173).
During the peak oil price period of the 1970s and the first half of the 1980s, 12 major oil firms decided to diversify into the geothermal energy business under the assumption that they could easily leverage their upstream oil capabilities for that purpose. In this thesis I examine how oil firms achieve a successful related-diversification into geothermal energy technologies building on the case studies of Union Oil Company of California and Phillips Petroleum and encompassing 5 geothermal fields and 28 units of analysis that represent the knowledge sources and transfer mechanisms required to overcome the technological and managerial differences between upstream oil and geothermal. The evidence is constructed based on backward patent citation analysis, company reports, literature review and in-depth interviews with the engineers and managers that ran the geothermal business. The two case studies are used to demonstrate that core competencies inherited from upstream oil are necessary but not sufficient to diversify into a related business field. Correspondingly, this research introduces the concept of "dynamic capabilities" to explain how the main enablers of the successful diversification into geothermal energy in the two cases studied, were each firm's dynamic capabilities of: absorbing knowledge from the industrial ecosystem, developing and exploiting internal scientific knowledge, and empowering decentralized business units. Understanding the way that oil firms leveraged their own competencies to diversify into geothermal energy during the oil price crisis can provide important insights into how oil and gas and other extractive industries can meet the sustainability challenges they currently face, and to enhance technology transfer in general. An additional contribution of this thesis is to frame its propositions by integrating concepts from the technology strategy literature into a causal-loop representation of the different factors that influence the evolution of a firm's knowledge stock and its transition into related business fields.
by Rodrigo Salvador Garćia Palma.
S.M. in Technology and Policy
182 pages
eng
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
Engineering Systems Division.
Technology and Policy Program.
Dynamic capabilities in related diversification : the case of geothermal technology development by oil companies
Thesis
application/pdf
false
Publication
unknown
unknown
<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="8d9dea75-62c0-43c1-9cfc-185aee67c4e5">
<Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type>
<Language>eng</Language>
<Title>Dynamic capabilities in related diversification : the case of geothermal technology development by oil companies</Title>
<PublishedIn>
<Publication>
</Publication>
</PublishedIn>
<PublicationDate>2014</PublicationDate>
<Authors>
<Author>
<DisplayName>Garćia Palma, Rodrigo Salvador</DisplayName>
<Affiliation>
<OrgUnit>
</OrgUnit>
</Affiliation>
</Author>
</Authors>
<Editors>
</Editors>
<Publishers>
<Publisher>
<DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology</DisplayName>
<OrgUnit />
</Publisher>
</Publishers>
<License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</License>
<Keyword>Engineering Systems Division.</Keyword>
<Keyword>Technology and Policy Program.</Keyword>
<Abstract>During the peak oil price period of the 1970s and the first half of the 1980s, 12 major oil firms decided to diversify into the geothermal energy business under the assumption that they could easily leverage their upstream oil capabilities for that purpose. In this thesis I examine how oil firms achieve a successful related-diversification into geothermal energy technologies building on the case studies of Union Oil Company of California and Phillips Petroleum and encompassing 5 geothermal fields and 28 units of analysis that represent the knowledge sources and transfer mechanisms required to overcome the technological and managerial differences between upstream oil and geothermal. The evidence is constructed based on backward patent citation analysis, company reports, literature review and in-depth interviews with the engineers and managers that ran the geothermal business. The two case studies are used to demonstrate that core competencies inherited from upstream oil are necessary but not sufficient to diversify into a related business field. Correspondingly, this research introduces the concept of "dynamic capabilities" to explain how the main enablers of the successful diversification into geothermal energy in the two cases studied, were each firm's dynamic capabilities of: absorbing knowledge from the industrial ecosystem, developing and exploiting internal scientific knowledge, and empowering decentralized business units. Understanding the way that oil firms leveraged their own competencies to diversify into geothermal energy during the oil price crisis can provide important insights into how oil and gas and other extractive industries can meet the sustainability challenges they currently face, and to enhance technology transfer in general. An additional contribution of this thesis is to frame its propositions by integrating concepts from the technology strategy literature into a causal-loop representation of the different factors that influence the evolution of a firm's knowledge stock and its transition into related business fields.</Abstract>
<Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right"
>
</Access>
</Publication>