2026-09-19T15:38:24Zhttps://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/requestoai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/900502022-01-31T20:48:47Zcom_1721.1_7582com_1721.1_7581col_1721.1_131023
Olivier de Weck.
Guinto, Roi John
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Technology and Policy Program.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division
Technology and Policy Program
2014-09-19T21:36:46Z
2014-09-19T21:36:46Z
2014
2014
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/90050
890140134
Thesis: S.M. in Technology and Policy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division, Technology and Policy Program, 2014.
Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 85-88). Gameography: page 89.
Gaming has been explored as a research technique in complex systems to explore human interactions within technical domains. These so-called "serious games" are designed for purposes outside of pure entertainment and are intended to help researchers engage with qualitative data that focuses on human behavior. This thesis focuses on a research game called ColumBID which was designed for the Production in the Innovation Economy shipbuilding study. This game seeks to understand the negotiation process in defense contracting and is used to facilitate and record the participants' movement through the tradespace. From a game theory perspective, we analyzed the non-Pareto dominant movements through the tradespace and found that humans explore the space by sliding along fronts until they reach an optimal and then jumping to another front to negotiate another optimal point. The players then compare these optimal points to simplify the multi-variable optimization. We found that an 8% contract price improvement in the competitive case compared to the monopolistic case. This thesis recommends that serious research game design focus on questions about the process rather than the endgame optimization.
by Roi John Guinto.
S.M. in Technology and Policy
89 pages
eng
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
Engineering Systems Division.
Technology and Policy Program.
Serious games for improved defense contracting
Thesis
application/pdf
false
Publication
unknown
unknown
<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="7842f4e7-9db7-4b2c-ac53-303aa31268ac">
<Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type>
<Language>eng</Language>
<Title>Serious games for improved defense contracting</Title>
<PublishedIn>
<Publication>
</Publication>
</PublishedIn>
<PublicationDate>2014</PublicationDate>
<Authors>
<Author>
<DisplayName>Guinto, Roi John</DisplayName>
<Affiliation>
<OrgUnit>
</OrgUnit>
</Affiliation>
</Author>
</Authors>
<Editors>
</Editors>
<Publishers>
<Publisher>
<DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology</DisplayName>
<OrgUnit />
</Publisher>
</Publishers>
<License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</License>
<Keyword>Engineering Systems Division.</Keyword>
<Keyword>Technology and Policy Program.</Keyword>
<Abstract>Gaming has been explored as a research technique in complex systems to explore human interactions within technical domains. These so-called "serious games" are designed for purposes outside of pure entertainment and are intended to help researchers engage with qualitative data that focuses on human behavior. This thesis focuses on a research game called ColumBID which was designed for the Production in the Innovation Economy shipbuilding study. This game seeks to understand the negotiation process in defense contracting and is used to facilitate and record the participants' movement through the tradespace. From a game theory perspective, we analyzed the non-Pareto dominant movements through the tradespace and found that humans explore the space by sliding along fronts until they reach an optimal and then jumping to another front to negotiate another optimal point. The players then compare these optimal points to simplify the multi-variable optimization. We found that an 8% contract price improvement in the competitive case compared to the monopolistic case. This thesis recommends that serious research game design focus on questions about the process rather than the endgame optimization.</Abstract>
<Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right"
>
</Access>
</Publication>