<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-19T10:10:42Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/90055" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/90055</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-31T20:52:43Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Kenneth A. Oye, Gigi Hirsch, and Magdalini Papadaki.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Liu, Tingyu</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Technology and Policy Program.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Technology and Policy Program</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2014-09-19T21:37:03Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2014-09-19T21:37:03Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2014</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2014</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/90055</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">890140407</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis: S.M. in Technology and Policy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division, Technology and Policy Program, 2014.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (pages 55-65).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">The rise of genomic technologies and increasing interest in personalized medicine have triggered a renewed focus on the role of biomarkers in drug development and clinical care. While many stakeholders, including industry, regulatory agencies, patients, academia, and payers, are involved in biomarker development and use, these stakeholders reside in functional siloes that lead to fragmented outputs and efforts. Thus, although biomarker discovery is extensive, biomarker adoption in the R&amp;D process and clinical care is slow, complex, and opaque. The gap between discovery and practice needs to be bridged by clear and consistent evidentiary standards, regulations and policies. Biomarker adoption requires a systems effort that includes active dialogue and understanding among all stakeholders. The level of discussions and resources (data, samples, expertise, financial, etc.) needed also makes this field particularly fertile for collaboration. This thesis suggests that multi-stakeholder collaborations (MSCs) can address the challenges of biomarker adoption. It describes what has been achieved in existing prominent MSCs, extracts general lessons on their contributions, and provides recommendations on the use of MSCs in drug development. Specifically, MSCs have demonstrated impact across 4 key areas: 1) data generation and establishment of standards; 2) development of scientific processes for biomarker evaluation and use; 3) the structuring of innovative operational and organizational scaffolds for collaboration; and 4) delivery of vetted regulatory recommendations and robust biomarkers for use by drug developers and clinicians. Understanding the roles, evolution, and challenges of MSCs will be important in enhancing the capacity to collaborate to address the complex challenges for biomedical innovation and healthcare outcomes.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Tingyu Liu.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">S.M. in Technology and Policy</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">65 pages</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Engineering Systems Division.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Technology and Policy Program.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Multi-stakeholder collaborations &amp; biomarker development and implementation</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" qualifier="alternative" lang="en_US">Multi-stakeholder collaborations and marker development and implementation</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="745b825c-1d98-45f5-9ebe-0864d2c910f3">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Multi-stakeholder collaborations &amp;amp; biomarker development and implementation&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;Subtitle>Multi-stakeholder collaborations and marker development and implementation&lt;/Subtitle>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2014&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Liu, Tingyu&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Engineering Systems Division.&lt;/Keyword>
    &lt;Keyword>Technology and Policy Program.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>The rise of genomic technologies and increasing interest in personalized medicine have triggered a renewed focus on the role of biomarkers in drug development and clinical care. While many stakeholders, including industry, regulatory agencies, patients, academia, and payers, are involved in biomarker development and use, these stakeholders reside in functional siloes that lead to fragmented outputs and efforts. Thus, although biomarker discovery is extensive, biomarker adoption in the R&amp;amp;D process and clinical care is slow, complex, and opaque. The gap between discovery and practice needs to be bridged by clear and consistent evidentiary standards, regulations and policies. Biomarker adoption requires a systems effort that includes active dialogue and understanding among all stakeholders. The level of discussions and resources (data, samples, expertise, financial, etc.) needed also makes this field particularly fertile for collaboration. This thesis suggests that multi-stakeholder collaborations (MSCs) can address the challenges of biomarker adoption. It describes what has been achieved in existing prominent MSCs, extracts general lessons on their contributions, and provides recommendations on the use of MSCs in drug development. Specifically, MSCs have demonstrated impact across 4 key areas: 1) data generation and establishment of standards; 2) development of scientific processes for biomarker evaluation and use; 3) the structuring of innovative operational and organizational scaffolds for collaboration; and 4) delivery of vetted regulatory recommendations and robust biomarkers for use by drug developers and clinicians. Understanding the roles, evolution, and challenges of MSCs will be important in enhancing the capacity to collaborate to address the complex challenges for biomedical innovation and healthcare outcomes.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>