2026-09-22T11:39:02Zhttps://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request

oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/907372022-01-13T07:54:52Zcom_1721.1_7582com_1721.1_7581col_1721.1_131023

Roberto Fernandez. Park, Jacqueline, S.M. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sloan School of Management. Sloan School of Management 2014-10-08T15:26:04Z 2014-10-08T15:26:04Z 2014 2014 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/90737 891322069 Thesis: S.M. in Management Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2014. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (pages 27-32). There has been an acceleration in the adoption of gender quotas on boards since Norway pioneered legislation in 2003. Countries that have made parallel reforms have primarily been in the western European bloc, while other countries have displayed strong resistance to this measure. The reasons underlying support and resistance have been argued across the globe, and their consistent application raises questions about why certain countries have been more aggressive in adopting quotas, compared to those that continue to resist. This paper aims to understand some of the national contexts of these countries. In doing so, a theoretical framework is applied using a selection of factors that may facilitate understanding and simplifying complexities within each polity. In addressing what common factors and disparities exist within and between countries that have adopted quotas compared to those that continue to oppose, potential implications for policy makers such as the use of critical junctures and the media become apparent. by Jacqueline Park. S.M. in Management Studies 32 pages eng Massachusetts Institute of Technology M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 Sloan School of Management. The global landscape of gender quotas on corporate boards : contexts for adoption and opposition in 2014 Thesis application/pdf false Publication unknown unknown <Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="c776ca9f-f09f-4aae-a7ea-3018ca51ad20"> <Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type> <Language>eng</Language> <Title>The global landscape of gender quotas on corporate boards : contexts for adoption and opposition in 2014</Title> <PublishedIn> <Publication> </Publication> </PublishedIn> <PublicationDate>2014</PublicationDate> <Authors> <Author> <DisplayName>Park, Jacqueline, S.M. Massachusetts Institute of Technology</DisplayName> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> </Authors> <Editors> </Editors> <Publishers> <Publisher> <DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology</DisplayName> <OrgUnit /> </Publisher> </Publishers> <License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</License> <Keyword>Sloan School of Management.</Keyword> <Abstract>There has been an acceleration in the adoption of gender quotas on boards since Norway pioneered legislation in 2003. Countries that have made parallel reforms have primarily been in the western European bloc, while other countries have displayed strong resistance to this measure. The reasons underlying support and resistance have been argued across the globe, and their consistent application raises questions about why certain countries have been more aggressive in adopting quotas, compared to those that continue to resist. This paper aims to understand some of the national contexts of these countries. In doing so, a theoretical framework is applied using a selection of factors that may facilitate understanding and simplifying complexities within each polity. In addressing what common factors and disparities exist within and between countries that have adopted quotas compared to those that continue to oppose, potential implications for policy makers such as the use of critical junctures and the media become apparent.</Abstract> <Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" > </Access> </Publication>