<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-19T02:22:55Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/90759" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/90759</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-27T21:57:27Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Roy Welsch and Daniel Whitney.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Frackleton, Conor J</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Leaders for Global Operations Program.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department" lang="en_US">Leaders for Global Operations Program at MIT</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Sloan School of Management</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="coverage" qualifier="spatial" lang="en_US">n-us---</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2014-10-08T15:27:22Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2014-10-08T15:27:22Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2014</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2014</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/90759</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">891375963</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis: M.B.A., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2014. In conjunction with the Leaders for Global Operations Program at MIT.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2014. In conjunction with the Leaders for Global Operations Program at MIT.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">5</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (page 64).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">The need to improve risk assessment methods for automation projects within United States manufacturers exists due to a shift toward increased in factory automation stemming from industry pressure to reduce manufacturing costs and increase production rates. This study explores the hypothesis that a risk assessment method, based on technology maturity analysis, can be used to reduce the time to decision, reduce the influence of personal bias, and improve the estimation of risk impact when evaluating proposed automation systems. The risk assessment method is based on the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) framework, coupled with a mathematical simulation of the manufacturing process. During the pilot implementation, a team of evaluators gathered data to create a process simulation, assessed the TRLs of automation proposals, and analyzed the risk of each proposal. After concluding the pilot, the evaluation team was interviewed to determine the success of the risk assessment method. The interviews revealed that the method resulted in a faster time to decision and improved estimations of risk, but failed to significantly reduce the influence of personal bias during the evaluation process.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Conor J. Frackleton.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">M.B.A.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">S.M.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">72 pages</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Sloan School of Management.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Mechanical Engineering.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Leaders for Global Operations Program.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Technology maturity analysis for assessing capacity and schedule risk of future automation projects</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="fb7116e8-97ac-4a07-b055-5ada3eb0bda9">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Technology maturity analysis for assessing capacity and schedule risk of future automation projects&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2014&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Frackleton, Conor J&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Sloan School of Management.&lt;/Keyword>
    &lt;Keyword>Mechanical Engineering.&lt;/Keyword>
    &lt;Keyword>Leaders for Global Operations Program.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>The need to improve risk assessment methods for automation projects within United States manufacturers exists due to a shift toward increased in factory automation stemming from industry pressure to reduce manufacturing costs and increase production rates. This study explores the hypothesis that a risk assessment method, based on technology maturity analysis, can be used to reduce the time to decision, reduce the influence of personal bias, and improve the estimation of risk impact when evaluating proposed automation systems. The risk assessment method is based on the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) framework, coupled with a mathematical simulation of the manufacturing process. During the pilot implementation, a team of evaluators gathered data to create a process simulation, assessed the TRLs of automation proposals, and analyzed the risk of each proposal. After concluding the pilot, the evaluation team was interviewed to determine the success of the risk assessment method. The interviews revealed that the method resulted in a faster time to decision and improved estimations of risk, but failed to significantly reduce the influence of personal bias during the evaluation process.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>