<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-26T16:25:16Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/9215" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/9215</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-13T07:54:52Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131023</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Richard M. Locke and Stanley B. Gershwin.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Lulgjuraj, Mark, 1973-</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Mechanical Engineering.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Sloan School of Management</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2005-08-22T23:34:55Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2005-08-22T23:34:55Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2000</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2000</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/9215</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">45489876</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis (M.B.A.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management; and, (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, 2000.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Also available online at the DSpace at MIT website.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (p. 91-93).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">The road to lean manufacturing has been long and hard for many companies. Intrigue Corporation is no exception. The company first introduced its version, the Intrigue Lean Manufacturing System, approximately ten years ago. Since then, the company has struggled with the system and continually refined it, attempting to make it stick. Different manufacturing plants have adopted the system with different amounts of energy. This thesis examines these implementations of the Intrigue Lean Manufacturing System and identifies the key factors that have inhibited a more thorough diffusion throughout Intrigue concluding that the ILMS did not take hold for two reasons. First, Intrigue did not understand the dynamics of change. Consequently, they did not take advantage of the high leverage points to tilt the odds of success in their favor. Second, the ILMS was incomplete and unstructured. Many additional elements are needed to guide individuals that are tasked with adopting the principles. The thesis recommends a model for Intrigue and other corporations to use to review the progress of any change initiative. The model is a powerful tool and aids one in understanding which dynamics may be potentially harmful and lead to failure of any change initiative. A redesign of the ILMS was begun to address many of these inhibiting factors. These activities and their subsequent implementation also describe in depth.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Mark Lulgjuraj.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">S.M.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">M.B.A.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">113 p.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent">10620001 bytes</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent">10619757 bytes</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Sloan School of Management.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Mechanical Engineering.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Lean manufacturing at a tier-1 automotive supplier</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="authorsordered">false</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="18cf7cb5-30f6-4319-97f5-0259e8fab506">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Lean manufacturing at a tier-1 automotive supplier&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2000&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Lulgjuraj, Mark, 1973-&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Sloan School of Management.&lt;/Keyword>
    &lt;Keyword>Mechanical Engineering.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>The road to lean manufacturing has been long and hard for many companies. Intrigue Corporation is no exception. The company first introduced its version, the Intrigue Lean Manufacturing System, approximately ten years ago. Since then, the company has struggled with the system and continually refined it, attempting to make it stick. Different manufacturing plants have adopted the system with different amounts of energy. This thesis examines these implementations of the Intrigue Lean Manufacturing System and identifies the key factors that have inhibited a more thorough diffusion throughout Intrigue concluding that the ILMS did not take hold for two reasons. First, Intrigue did not understand the dynamics of change. Consequently, they did not take advantage of the high leverage points to tilt the odds of success in their favor. Second, the ILMS was incomplete and unstructured. Many additional elements are needed to guide individuals that are tasked with adopting the principles. The thesis recommends a model for Intrigue and other corporations to use to review the progress of any change initiative. The model is a powerful tool and aids one in understanding which dynamics may be potentially harmful and lead to failure of any change initiative. A redesign of the ILMS was begun to address many of these inhibiting factors. These activities and their subsequent implementation also describe in depth.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>