2026-09-21T10:41:54Zhttps://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request

oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/921802022-01-13T07:54:05Zcom_1721.1_7582com_1721.1_7581col_1721.1_131024

Sanjay E. Sarma. Gillund, Daniel P Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering 2014-12-08T18:54:49Z 2014-12-08T18:54:49Z 2014 2014 http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/92180 897205934 Thesis: S.B., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2014. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (page 40). The consumer market currently offers no options for a low-cost, personal ascending device. The purpose of this project is to propose a powered ascender, actuated by common power tool components and operating on the principle of a capstan winch, as a candidate to fill that void. The first objective was to design and construct a working prototype. The second was to explore the feasibility of manufacturing a low cost consumer version of the product. Safety, functionality, and cost drove the design process. The ascender was designed and built around the motor and gearbox from a Dewalt 36v hammerdrill. Individual components were machined in undergraduate machine shops on the MIT campus and in the MIT Hobby Shop. Testing of the ascender was carried out using standard gym equipment and weights. The completed unit can lift 100 kg at 0.4 meters per second with an overall efficiency of 8.5%. This result was 57% lower than the predicted speed of 0.7 meters per second with an expected 14.7% efficiency. Analysis revealed a design flaw which can account for most of the discrepancy in the predicted and observed performance and which can easily be remedied. Powered ascenders within the same speed and load range are sold for several thousand dollars, demonstrating the feasibility of a low cost powered ascender as a viable product. by Daniel P. Gillund. S.B. 40 pages eng Massachusetts Institute of Technology M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 Mechanical Engineering. Design and prototype of a personal ascending device based on the principle of a capstan winch Thesis application/pdf Publication unknown unknown <Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="bd166f34-0ba2-411a-8827-6fca4fd9da7f"> <Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type> <Language>eng</Language> <Title>Design and prototype of a personal ascending device based on the principle of a capstan winch</Title> <PublishedIn> <Publication> </Publication> </PublishedIn> <PublicationDate>2014</PublicationDate> <Authors> <Author> <DisplayName>Gillund, Daniel P</DisplayName> <Affiliation> <OrgUnit> </OrgUnit> </Affiliation> </Author> </Authors> <Editors> </Editors> <Publishers> <Publisher> <DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology</DisplayName> <OrgUnit /> </Publisher> </Publishers> <License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</License> <Keyword>Mechanical Engineering.</Keyword> <Abstract>The consumer market currently offers no options for a low-cost, personal ascending device. The purpose of this project is to propose a powered ascender, actuated by common power tool components and operating on the principle of a capstan winch, as a candidate to fill that void. The first objective was to design and construct a working prototype. The second was to explore the feasibility of manufacturing a low cost consumer version of the product. Safety, functionality, and cost drove the design process. The ascender was designed and built around the motor and gearbox from a Dewalt 36v hammerdrill. Individual components were machined in undergraduate machine shops on the MIT campus and in the MIT Hobby Shop. Testing of the ascender was carried out using standard gym equipment and weights. The completed unit can lift 100 kg at 0.4 meters per second with an overall efficiency of 8.5%. This result was 57% lower than the predicted speed of 0.7 meters per second with an expected 14.7% efficiency. Analysis revealed a design flaw which can account for most of the discrepancy in the predicted and observed performance and which can easily be remedied. Powered ascenders within the same speed and load range are sold for several thousand dollars, demonstrating the feasibility of a low cost powered ascender as a viable product.</Abstract> <Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" > </Access> </Publication>