<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-09-20T00:14:24Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/92681" metadataPrefix="dim">https://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/92681</identifier><datestamp>2022-01-13T07:54:05Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_1721.1_7582</setSpec><setSpec>com_1721.1_7581</setSpec><setSpec>col_1721.1_131024</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="advisor" lang="en_US">Alexander Slocum.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" lang="en_US">Sachs, Adam D</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="other" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="department">Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2015-01-05T20:05:20Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2015-01-05T20:05:20Z</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="copyright" lang="en_US">2014</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued" lang="en_US">2014</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/92681</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="oclc" lang="en_US">898210282</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Thesis: S.B., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2014.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" lang="en_US">Includes bibliographical references (page 32).</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="en_US">With millions of abdominal surgeries performed annually in the United States alone, abdominal surgery is both a large market and a large medial issue. The entire industry surrounding abdominal surgery has strived to reduce the pain and trauma associated with an operation by reducing the number and size of incisions made in the abdominal wall, but in the process of reducing openings into the abdomen, the difficulty of operating increases. In order to retract organs within the abdominal cavity while further reducing the number of ports required for surgery, the author has previously designed and fabricated a device to be inserted into the abdominal cavity through one small port. Once inside of the abdominal cavity, the device is expands to form a rigid platform across the ventral abdominal wall serving as a platform for organ retraction. While the previously fabricated device functions as intended, it's rigid shape does not match the shape of the ventral abdominal wall, and as such, the device occupies unnecessary operating space. The work of this paper involves the design of a system to permit the existing device to conform to the shape of the ventral abdominal wall while still supporting a load. Two methods were examined to permit the device to conform while still supporting a load: Flexure and Hinged joints. Both flexure and hinged joints were developed, prototyped, and analyzed to meet all functional requirements. Both methods proved ultimately successful in meeting functional requirements, yet flexure joints were significance easier to produce and thus represent a more viable solution for mass production.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="statementofresponsibility" lang="en_US">by Adam D. Sachs.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="degree" lang="en_US">S.B.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="extent" lang="en_US">32 pages</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="en_US">eng</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="publisher" lang="en_US">Massachusetts Institute of Technology</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" lang="en_US">M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="uri" lang="en_US">http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" lang="en_US">Mechanical Engineering.</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="en_US">Flexible support scaffold for organ retraction in laparoscopic surgery</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="en_US">Thesis</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype">application/pdf</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="dspace" element="entity" qualifier="type">Publication</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="others" element="access-status">unknown</dim:field>
   <dim:field mdschema="cerif" element="openaire" authority="" confidence="-1">&lt;Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="bb5583d2-30f2-4761-99c6-d07fda903693">
	&lt;Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843&lt;/Type>
	&lt;Language>eng&lt;/Language>
   	&lt;Title>Flexible support scaffold for organ retraction in laparoscopic surgery&lt;/Title>
   	&lt;PublishedIn>
    	&lt;Publication>
      	&lt;/Publication>
   	&lt;/PublishedIn>
   	&lt;PublicationDate>2014&lt;/PublicationDate>
   	&lt;Authors>
      	&lt;Author>
        	&lt;DisplayName>Sachs, Adam D&lt;/DisplayName>
         	&lt;Affiliation>
         		&lt;OrgUnit>
         		&lt;/OrgUnit>
         	&lt;/Affiliation>
      	&lt;/Author>
	&lt;/Authors>
   	&lt;Editors>
	&lt;/Editors>
    &lt;Publishers>
        &lt;Publisher>
            &lt;DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology&lt;/DisplayName>
            &lt;OrgUnit />
        &lt;/Publisher>
    &lt;/Publishers>
    &lt;License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582&lt;/License>
    &lt;Keyword>Mechanical Engineering.&lt;/Keyword>
   	&lt;Abstract>With millions of abdominal surgeries performed annually in the United States alone, abdominal surgery is both a large market and a large medial issue. The entire industry surrounding abdominal surgery has strived to reduce the pain and trauma associated with an operation by reducing the number and size of incisions made in the abdominal wall, but in the process of reducing openings into the abdomen, the difficulty of operating increases. In order to retract organs within the abdominal cavity while further reducing the number of ports required for surgery, the author has previously designed and fabricated a device to be inserted into the abdominal cavity through one small port. Once inside of the abdominal cavity, the device is expands to form a rigid platform across the ventral abdominal wall serving as a platform for organ retraction. While the previously fabricated device functions as intended, it&amp;apos;s rigid shape does not match the shape of the ventral abdominal wall, and as such, the device occupies unnecessary operating space. The work of this paper involves the design of a system to permit the existing device to conform to the shape of the ventral abdominal wall while still supporting a load. Two methods were examined to permit the device to conform while still supporting a load: Flexure and Hinged joints. Both flexure and hinged joints were developed, prototyped, and analyzed to meet all functional requirements. Both methods proved ultimately successful in meeting functional requirements, yet flexure joints were significance easier to produce and thus represent a more viable solution for mass production.&lt;/Abstract>
	&lt;Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right" 
    >
    &lt;/Access>
&lt;/Publication>
</dim:field>
</dim:dim>
</metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>