2026-09-24T08:23:08Zhttps://dspace.mit.edu/server/oai/requestoai:dspace.mit.edu:1721.1/92842022-01-13T07:54:52Zcom_1721.1_7582com_1721.1_7581col_1721.1_131023
Peter M. Senge.
Greenway, Joy M., 1960-
Weiland, Jeruld P. 1959-
Sloan School of Management.
Sloan School of Management
2005-08-23T12:00:00Z
2005-08-23T12:00:00Z
2000
2000
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/9284
45752496
Thesis (M.B.A.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2000.
Includes bibliographical references (leaves 57-58).
This thesis investigates the hypothesis "Building capacity for sustainable innovation, enabled by broader employee engagement and improved capabilities, increases both employee and organizational fulfillment". A deep understanding is first built around the relationship between individual fulfillment, organizational fulfillment, and innovation. We then examine capacity building for innovation, both in the context of capability as well as broader engagement of employee's in innovation. The intellectual bases of the thesis are literature surveys based upon the work of Peter Senge, in The Fifth Discipline and The Dance of Change; the work of Sumantra Ghoshal and Christopher Bartlett in The Individualized Corporation; the work of Gary Hamel and C.K. Prahlad in Competing for the Future; the work of Clayton Christensen in The Innovator's Dilemma; as well as current professional journal publications from these authors, and other literature relevant to the topic. Further intellectual support comes from author conducted interviews with Peter Senge, Sumantra Ghoshal, and Clayton Christensen, and exchanges with Gary Hamel. Study missions to two companies who are implementing the practices described in this thesis in pockets of their organizations provide relevant and current insight into the practical aspects and challenges of innovation, capacity building, individual fulfillment, and organizational fulfillment.
by Joy M. Greenway and Jeruld P. Weiland.
M.B.A.
104 leaves
9090074 bytes
9089833 bytes
application/pdf
application/pdf
eng
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.
http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
Sloan School of Management.
Building capacity for innovation as a source of individual and organizational fulfillment
Thesis
application/pdf
Publication
unknown
unknown
<Publication xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/1.1/" id="a3021b3a-5855-42a5-a686-1826971e44e9">
<Type xmlns="https://www.openaire.eu/cerif-profile/vocab/COAR_Publication_Types">http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843</Type>
<Language>eng</Language>
<Title>Building capacity for innovation as a source of individual and organizational fulfillment</Title>
<PublishedIn>
<Publication>
</Publication>
</PublishedIn>
<PublicationDate>2000</PublicationDate>
<Authors>
<Author>
<DisplayName>Greenway, Joy M., 1960-</DisplayName>
<Affiliation>
<OrgUnit>
</OrgUnit>
</Affiliation>
</Author>
<Author>
<DisplayName>Weiland, Jeruld P. 1959-</DisplayName>
<Affiliation>
<OrgUnit>
</OrgUnit>
</Affiliation>
</Author>
</Authors>
<Editors>
</Editors>
<Publishers>
<Publisher>
<DisplayName>Massachusetts Institute of Technology</DisplayName>
<OrgUnit />
</Publisher>
</Publishers>
<License>http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582</License>
<Keyword>Sloan School of Management.</Keyword>
<Abstract>This thesis investigates the hypothesis "Building capacity for sustainable innovation, enabled by broader employee engagement and improved capabilities, increases both employee and organizational fulfillment". A deep understanding is first built around the relationship between individual fulfillment, organizational fulfillment, and innovation. We then examine capacity building for innovation, both in the context of capability as well as broader engagement of employee's in innovation. The intellectual bases of the thesis are literature surveys based upon the work of Peter Senge, in The Fifth Discipline and The Dance of Change; the work of Sumantra Ghoshal and Christopher Bartlett in The Individualized Corporation; the work of Gary Hamel and C.K. Prahlad in Competing for the Future; the work of Clayton Christensen in The Innovator's Dilemma; as well as current professional journal publications from these authors, and other literature relevant to the topic. Further intellectual support comes from author conducted interviews with Peter Senge, Sumantra Ghoshal, and Clayton Christensen, and exchanges with Gary Hamel. Study missions to two companies who are implementing the practices described in this thesis in pockets of their organizations provide relevant and current insight into the practical aspects and challenges of innovation, capacity building, individual fulfillment, and organizational fulfillment.</Abstract>
<Access xmlns="http://purl.org/coar/access_right"
>
</Access>
</Publication>