Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAndrew W. Lo.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMontazerhodjat, Vahiden_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-18T20:05:27Z
dc.date.available2016-07-18T20:05:27Z
dc.date.copyright2016en_US
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103739
dc.descriptionThesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2016.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 103-111).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe productivity of research and development in the bio-pharmaceutical industry has been constantly declining since the early 2000's. One possible reason is that biomedical projects are risky, take a long time, and require significant investment. Hence, substantial capital has been shifted away from the bio-pharmaceutical industry to other industries that are perceived less risky, creating a funding gap for early-stage pharmaceutical R&D. Here, we investigate and improve upon a novel financing technique that has been proposed to facilitate the R&D funding in the bio-pharmaceutical industry. This new financing method is a clear example of rapidly evolving innovation in the financial industry, from which the bio-pharmaceutical industry can benefit tremendously. Apart from funding challenges, pharmaceutical companies have to clear regulatory hurdles before they can commercialize their treatments. These drug-regulatory standards require a specific balance of benefits vs. risks for a therapy to be approved, and do not currently take into account the severity of the disease that the therapy is targeting. In the second part of this thesis, we propose an objective and quantitative Bayesian decision analysis framework to incorporate patients' feedback into the drug-approval process, and propose adjustment to the approval standards based on disease severity. When launching their drug, pharmaceutical companies set the drug's price such that expected revenues offset the costs of all the projects, failed or successful, that were pursued in order to lead to this successful treatment resulting in costly treatment. Recently, some highly curative therapies with high price tags have emerged for diseases with large prevalence, such as hepatitis C. These high prices, coupled with the large size of the patient population, have created an unsupportable financial burden for insurance companies in order to cover the broadest patient population who could benefit from these drugs. Despite delivering breakthrough discoveries, the pharmaceutical companies producing these drugs have experienced a public backlash due to drug prices. In the last part of this dissertation, we introduce a new financing paradigm to address the issue of high aggregate costs for these highly curative therapies.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Vahid Montazerhodjat.en_US
dc.format.extent111 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectElectrical Engineering and Computer Science.en_US
dc.titleRedefining how pharmaceutical innovation gets doneen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh. D.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
dc.identifier.oclc953525100en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record