Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDevavrat Shah and Mark Abramson.en_US
dc.contributor.authorShen, Dennis,Ph. D.Massachusetts Institute of Technology.en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-06T20:17:39Z
dc.date.available2021-01-06T20:17:39Z
dc.date.copyright2020en_US
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/129306
dc.descriptionThesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, September, 2020en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from student-submitted PDF of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 177-185).en_US
dc.description.abstractQuantifying the causal effect of an intervention is a ubiquitous problem that spans a wide net of applications. Typically, this quantity is measured through the difference in outcomes under treatment (e.g., novel drug) and control (e.g., placebo). However, only one outcome ever be revealed - this is the fundamental challenge in causal inference. In order to overcome this obstacle, there have been two main types of studies: experimental (ES) and observational (OS). While the former conducts carefully designed experiments, the latter utilizes observed data. In this thesis, we reinterpret the classical potential outcomes framework of Rubin through the lens of tensors. Formally, each entry of the potential outcomes tensor is associated with a tuple of entities; namely, the measurement (e.g., time), unit (e.g., patient type), and intervention (e.g., drug).en_US
dc.description.abstractSubsequently, each study can be characterized by a unique sparsity pattern, which allows us to translate the age old problem of estimating counterfactuals into one of tensor estimation. As an added benefit, our tensor formulation also opens the door to discussions about the computational and statistical trade-offs of causal inference methods, a conversation (to the best of our knowledge) that has largely not yet been had. Ultimately, this novel perspective, coupled with basic principles of the popular synthetic control method for OSs, enables us to provably estimate counterfactual potential outcomes for every unit under all treatments and control with low sample and computational complexity. As a result, we can customize treatment plans for every unit in a computationally tractable and data-efficient manner. Pleasingly, we show that this result bears implications towards what-if scenario planning, drug discovery, and personalized, data-efficient randomized control trials.en_US
dc.description.abstractMethodically, we furnish a data-driven hypothesis test to check when our algorithm can reliably recover the underlying tensor. The key technical contribution of this thesis advances the state-of-the art analysis for principal component regression.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Dennis Shen.en_US
dc.format.extent185 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsMIT theses may be protected by copyright. Please reuse MIT thesis content according to the MIT Libraries Permissions Policy, which is available through the URL provided.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectElectrical Engineering and Computer Science.en_US
dc.titleCausal inference : a Tensor's perspectiveen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh. D.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.identifier.oclc1227768557en_US
dc.description.collectionPh.D. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Scienceen_US
dspace.imported2021-01-06T20:17:38Zen_US
mit.thesis.degreeDoctoralen_US
mit.thesis.departmentEECSen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record