Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMichael A. Cusumano.en_US
dc.contributor.authorReichert-Facilides, Christopher, 1964-en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Management of Technology Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2005-06-02T19:03:33Z
dc.date.available2005-06-02T19:03:33Z
dc.date.copyright2004en_US
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/17886
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.M.O.T.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, Management of Technology Program, 2004.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 87-88).en_US
dc.description.abstractWhy are some industrial design firms more successful than others in consistently producing high quality products and services? Do they hire more talented people, or are they organized so as to maximize the potential of their teams? I begin this thesis with an examination of literature on teamwork, the dynamics of idea propagation, and the product development process itself. This is meant to extract some insights into successful teams across a broad spectrum of activities and what they did to generate a creative output. These examples include references to historically significant teams such as Thomas Edison's Lab and the Manhattan Project. By using such extreme examples, I am seeking similarities in more common projects and organizations. I use a workgroup framework to analyze the factors involved, including the context, the people on the teams, their task requirements and formal organization, group cultures that emerge, as well as the outcomes that define the success, or otherwise of a project. I interviewed a number of professionals in the industry. These include professionals from IDEO, Design Continuum, Modo, and sevenO2design, as well as professors at the MIT School of Engineering, Media Lab, Sloan School, and Olin College of Engineering. The main focus is in analyzing the collaborative processes and methods of these sample organizations. My objective is to identify their methodology for organizing the creative process and how they maintain a high standard across projects, industries and over time.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Christopher Reichert-Facilides.en_US
dc.format.extent88 p.en_US
dc.format.extent4558323 bytes
dc.format.extent4558130 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectManagement of Technology Program.en_US
dc.titleOrganizing for innovation : an examination of collaborative teams in industrial designen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.M.O.T.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentManagement of Technology Program.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Management
dc.identifier.oclc56664667en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record