Advanced Search
DSpace@MIT

Innovation, wargaming, and the development of armored warfare

Research and Teaching Output of the MIT Community

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Barry R. Posen. en_US
dc.contributor.author Carter, Daniel S. (Daniel Simon) en_US
dc.contributor.other Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Political Science. en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2006-07-31T15:23:48Z
dc.date.available 2006-07-31T15:23:48Z
dc.date.copyright 2005 en_US
dc.date.issued 2005 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/33688
dc.description Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Political Science, 2005. en_US
dc.description Pages 73 and 74 blank. en_US
dc.description Includes bibliographical references. en_US
dc.description.abstract This thesis examines the role of simulation in the development of armored warfare doctrine during the interwar period. All the Great Powers faced the challenge of how to integrate new technologies, particularly the tank, radio, and aircraft, into a coherent combined arms doctrinal framework. I compare the French and German experiences in order to assess the role that wargames played in driving doctrinal development. The case studies show that wargames, on the map and in the field, gave the German army a significant edge as it sought to develop new doctrine for armored warfare. This finding is an important addition to existing theory on military innovation, which tends to view doctrine as the product of geopolitical and organizational forces. Wargames provided a means of testing doctrinal ideas in a simulated wartime environment, and the lessons learned during these simulations fed into ongoing debates on doctrinal development. Wargaming well is a technically challenging business, and requires particular technical skills and capabilities. The Germans developed these capabilities earlier than their French counterparts, in part because the German army traditionally favored a rationalist, corporate approach to the management of military affairs. en_US
dc.description.abstract (cont.) This cultural outlook made it easier to develop a rigorous wargaming capability, and also meant that lessons learned in games were taken more seriously than they were in France. Given the right conditions, wargaming can be a powerful tool for developing new military doctrine during peacetime, thus conferring a significant edge on the battlefield should war erupt. en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibility by Daniel S. Carter. en_US
dc.format.extent 74 p. en_US
dc.format.extent 4184013 bytes
dc.format.extent 4187030 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology en_US
dc.rights M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. en_US
dc.rights.uri http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subject Political Science. en_US
dc.title Innovation, wargaming, and the development of armored warfare en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dc.description.degree S.M. en_US
dc.contributor.department Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Political Science. en_US
dc.identifier.oclc 64634986 en_US


Files in this item

Name Size Format Description
64634986.pdf 3.990Mb PDF Preview, non-printable (open to all)
64634986-MIT.pdf 3.993Mb PDF Full printable version (MIT only)

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

MIT-Mirage