Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAlex (Sandy) Pentland.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDong, Wenen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture. Program In Media Arts and Sciencesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-05-16T18:28:40Z
dc.date.available2007-05-16T18:28:40Z
dc.date.copyright2006en_US
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/37386
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, School of Architecture and Planning, Program in Media Arts and Sciences, 2006.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 75-76).en_US
dc.description.abstractA complex stochastic process involving human behaviors or human group behaviors is computationally hard to model with a hidden Markov process. This is because the state space of such behaviors is often a Cartesian product of a large number of constituent probability spaces, and is exponentially large. A sample for those stochastic processes is normally composed of a large collection of heterogeneous constituent samples. How to combine those heterogeneous constituent samples in a consistent and stable way is another difficulty for the hidden Markov process modeling. A latent structure influence process models human behaviors and human group behaviors by emulating the work of a team of experts. In such a team, each expert concentrates on one constituent probability space, investigates one type of constituent samples, and/or employ one type of technique. An expert improves his work by considering the results from the other experts, instead of the raw data for them. Compared with the hidden Markov process, the latent structure influence process is more expressive, more stable to outliers, and less likely to overfit. It can be used to study the interaction of over 100 persons and get good results.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) This thesis is organized in the following way. Chapter 0 reviews the notation and the background concepts necessary to develop this thesis. Chapter 1 describes the intuition behind the latent structure influence process and the situations where it outperforms the other dynamic models. In Chapter 2, we give inference algorithms based on two different interpretations of the influence model. Chapter 3 applies the influence algorithms to various toy data sets and real-world data sets. We hope our demonstrations of the influence modeling could serve as templates for the readers to develop other applications. In Chapter 4, we conclude with the rationale and other considerations for influence modeling.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Wen Dong.en_US
dc.format.extent76 leavesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectArchitecture. Program In Media Arts and Sciencesen_US
dc.titleInfluence modeling of complex stochastic processesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentProgram in Media Arts and Sciences (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
dc.identifier.oclc122905859en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record