Advanced Search
DSpace@MIT

On the interpretation of concealed questions

Research and Teaching Output of the MIT Community

Planned maintenance alert - Monday, April 21: DSpace@MIT will undergo maintenance activities that will affect service availability and access to file content. While the service interruptions should be brief, access to file content may take longer to restore. Status updates will be posted to http://3down.mit.edu/.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Kai von Fintel. en_US
dc.contributor.author Nathan, Lance Edward en_US
dc.contributor.other Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy. en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2007-05-16T18:34:35Z
dc.date.available 2007-05-16T18:34:35Z
dc.date.copyright 2006 en_US
dc.date.issued 2006 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/37423
dc.description Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2006. en_US
dc.description Includes bibliographical references (p. 151-152). en_US
dc.description.abstract Determiner phrases have the ability to act as "concealed questions" (CQs), embedded questions in sentences like John knows the time (i.e., John knows what time it is). The fact that know and wonder differ in their ability to embed CQs partially motivated the hypothesis (Grimshaw 1979) that verbs select the possible syntactic categories of their complements independently of selection for the semantic type of their complements. Theories of CQ meaning generally follow Grimshaw in assuming them to denote questions, or else take them to denote individual concepts (intensions of individuals; Heim 1979, Romero 2005). This dissertation argue that the former assumption does not easily describe the semantically conditioned distribution of CQs, which can be embedded under only those verbs which allow propositional complements as well as question complements. The latter assumption, on the other hand, incorrectly predicts that any DP with an individual concept meaning can be used as a CQ. en_US
dc.description.abstract (cont.) We therefore need a new theory of CQ denotations, and this dissertation proposes that CQs denote propositions, so that the time in John knows the time actually denotes the proposition that the time is x, where x has the value of whatever the current time might be. In this theory, relatively little machinery is required to restrict the distribution of CQs, and it is possible to restrict propositional denotations to only those DPs which can act as CQs, using facts about relational nouns and the composition of relative clause modification. en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibility by Lance Edward Nathan. en_US
dc.format.extent 152 p. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology en_US
dc.rights M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. en_US
dc.rights.uri http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subject Linguistics and Philosophy. en_US
dc.title On the interpretation of concealed questions en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dc.description.degree Ph.D. en_US
dc.contributor.department Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy. en_US
dc.identifier.oclc 123084995 en_US


Files in this item

Name Size Format Description
123084995.pdf 11.53Mb PDF Preview, non-printable (open to all)
123084995-MIT.pdf 11.53Mb PDF Full printable version (MIT only)

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

MIT-Mirage