Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMaria Mody.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWehner, Daniel Ten_US
dc.contributor.otherHarvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-23T14:50:29Z
dc.date.available2009-01-23T14:50:29Z
dc.date.copyright2007en_US
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/39575en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/39575
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph. D.)--Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, 2007.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 117-135).en_US
dc.description.abstractChildren with dyslexia struggle with learning to read despite adequate intelligence, motivation, and schooling. Over the years, there has been a growing consensus about the role of phonological processing in reading disability. Poor readers typically do worse than their normal reading peers on tasks that require phonological processing which has been linked, directly or indirectly, to their speech perception abilities. The work in this thesis combined behavioral, MEG, and EEG methods to examine how normal and reading-impaired children, 7-13 years of age, perceive speech under varying degrees of phonological contrast (1 vs. 3 phonetic features). In a series of auditory word perception experiments, good and poor readers were found to do worse in accuracy and/or reaction times in phonologically similar (i.e., 1-feature contrast) than phonologically dissimilar (i.e., 2 or 3-feature contrast) conditions. Despite the similar behavioral performance and EEG responses for the two groups, a region of interest (ROI) based MEG approach revealed differences in the brain activation of the two groups in superior temporal regions at 140 to 300 ms.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) In the auditory word discrimination task, differences in activation were found in good readers but not poor readers, as a function of the degree of phonological contrast, reflecting poor readers' lack of sensitivity to the phonological characteristics of the word stimuli. In the sentence plausibility judgment task, the impaired phonological processing abilities of the poor readers may have led them to rely more on top-down sentence context to perceptually disambiguate phonologically confusing terminal words, thereby deceiving them into accepting the phonologically similar incongruent sentences as being congruent. This may account for the poor reader group's reduced brain activation in the phonologically demanding condition in the sentence task. The results of the experiments are consistent with a phonological view of reading disability according to which children with reading impairments have poorly defined phonological representations.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Daniel T. Wehner.en_US
dc.format.extent135 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/39575en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectHarvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology.en_US
dc.titlePhonological and semantic influences on auditory word perception in children with and without reading impairments using magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG)en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentHarvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology
dc.identifier.oclc174281250en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record