Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorEric von Hippel.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHajdukiewicz, John Ren_US
dc.contributor.otherSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-09-03T15:26:10Z
dc.date.available2008-09-03T15:26:10Z
dc.date.copyright2006en_US
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/42358
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, System Design and Management Program, February 2007.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 61-62).en_US
dc.description.abstractInnovation has been long known to be difficult to accomplish in large companies that have well structured processes. Structured processes (such as the use of Six Sigma) can provide significant benefits in terms of efficiency and productivity. However, it can also hinder innovation in that it zones in on local, incremental solutions too quickly. This thesis explores different strategies corporations may take in incorporating innovation at their organizations. First, background and theory are presented to guide the discussion, grounded on ecological psychology. Second, a case study (VisionPRO Thermostat) is presented that provides insight in how innovation can work in large structured organizations; in this case, outsourcing and the use of common tools were used as the innovation strategy and transfer mechanism. Third, the discussion is expanded to broader corporate strategies that can inject innovation in product development processes. Innovation and structured processes are at odds with each other and need to be managed with different approaches. Innovation processes require creative isolation from high structure to open degrees of freedom and the design space; this can be accomplished through multiple strategies such as outsourcing, buying, injecting, incubating, co- locating, spinning-off, and distributing. Structured processes should rely on a high level of constraints that are highly predictable to push productivity and efficiency; this can be accomplished through Six Sigma and lean processes. Interfaces between the two sets of processes are critical to mediate effective transfer and insertion in product lines; in the case of the VisionPRO, common language (i.e., the common use of certain Six Sigma tools) and people played the interface role. Finally, conclusions, contributions, limitations, and future research are presented.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby John Roman Hajdukiewicz.en_US
dc.format.extent62 leavesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.titleAchieving innovation and development speed in large structured organizations : an ecological view and case studyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.identifier.oclc234195765en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record