Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorPeter P. Belobaba.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPyrgiotis, Nikolasen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-30T16:27:20Z
dc.date.available2009-01-30T16:27:20Z
dc.date.copyright2008en_US
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/44278
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2008.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 131-132).en_US
dc.description.abstractSince 2000 the US airline industry has gone through a severe crisis which initiated important changes in the competitive environment of the industry. The economic downturn, the fierce competition between Legacy carriers, the rapid expansion of Low Cost carriers, the soaring fuel prices and the 9/11 attacks are some of the reasons that put many US airlines into a financial crisis. Many of the traditional major US airlines were forced into bankruptcy during the first five years of the decade. That forced Legacy airlines to change their pricing strategies to better match their LCC competitors and stimulate demand. This thesis concentrates on the pricing and competition between Legacy and low cost carriers in the US domestic markets by analyzing the Top 1000 US domestic markets. A new metric is introduced, the yield index, that compares fares among airlines in specific markets in order to quantify the fares collected by major airlines with respect to their competitors in different segments of the domestic market. Furthermore a quantitative analysis of competition is performed to identify important changes during the years of the crisis. The average fare gap between Legacy carriers and LCCs that existed in 2000 was shrinking until 2005. The traffic and revenue losses of Legacy carriers combined with the rapid expansion of LCCs have also mitigated the market share difference and revenue difference between Legacy and LCC carriers. Legacy carriers were forced out of numerous domestic markets by new competition. Overall, the average number of competitors in domestic markets has dropped from above three in 2000 to below three in 2006 but the average number of LCCs has increased. Only four out of six Legacy carriers have held an average yield premium in the Top US domestic markets.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) On the other hand all Legacy carriers maintained a yield premium in the local markets of their hubs. It was observed however that the yield premium in hub markets decreased during the crisis, and the most financially distressed airlines have had the lowest yield premiums.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Nikolas Pyrgiotis.en_US
dc.format.extent132 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectCivil and Environmental Engineering.en_US
dc.titlePrice competition in the top US domestic markets : revenues and yield premiumen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
dc.identifier.oclc268678981en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record