Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorLangley Keyes.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCherry, Jonathan S. (Jonathan Sher)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-01T16:54:18Z
dc.date.available2009-07-01T16:54:18Z
dc.date.copyright2008en_US
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/44363en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/44363
dc.descriptionThesis (M.C.P.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2008.en_US
dc.descriptionThis electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.en_US
dc.description.abstractAs wind power has spread in North America, so has an awareness that community acceptance will largely determine whether this renewable energy source continues to grow. Despite apparently widespread popular support for wind energy, a number of proposals for wind farms in rural and offshore locations have been derailed by local concerns. Meanwhile, several towns and cities have begun to explore another possibility: siting wind projects in urban areas. This thesis provides a framework to help readers compare the stories told about wind power in cities to the experiences in rural or "pristine" locations. It asks: 1) What are the motivations for wind power development in the urban context? 2) Does the community and political response to wind power in towns and cities differ from the experience in rural or offshore settings? To answer these questions, I investigated wind energy projects in Hull (Boston, MA region), Toronto (ON), Palmdale (Los Angeles, CA region), and Lackawanna (Buffalo, NY region). Based on a review of existing literature on rural wind siting controversies, I anticipated that local opinions about urban wind power would be formed primarily by expectations about the urban skyline and natural landscape, choice of ownership models, and the extent of meaningful community participation in the planning process. I found that while many of the factors highlighted in research on rural wind siting did affect community acceptance in the four cases, the greater social and spatial complexity of the "local" urban environment created new challenges. I conclude that 1) stories about urban wind power's costs and benefits diverged at the neighborhood scale and city scale;en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) 2) the use of degraded and industrial sites helped in siting turbines, but did not guarantee success due to the multiple interpretations of even these sites; 3) "local" ownership did not necessarily quell controversies over siting; and 4) political dynamics that were largely unrelated to the specific projects strongly influenced communities' receptiveness to proposed wind development. I suggest several strategies to help cities plan for urban wind power initiatives at a larger scale that are equitable and provide meaningful environmental and economic benefits.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Jonathan S. Cherry.en_US
dc.format.extent116 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/44363en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectUrban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.titleThe windy city : harnessing power in the neighborhood landscapeen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.C.P.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
dc.identifier.oclc276870177en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record