Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorStephen D. Ansolabehere.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSled, Sarah Marieen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Political Science.en_US
dc.coverage.spatialn-us---en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-08-26T17:09:00Z
dc.date.available2009-08-26T17:09:00Z
dc.date.copyright2008en_US
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/46634
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Political Science, 2008.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 81-84).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe goal of this dissertation is to aid our understanding of how electoral institutions in the United States affect political participation and, in turn, shape policy outcomes. I investigate this relationship by analyzing the all-mail balloting method known as Vote By Mail. Using a data set of 3310 cases representing elections in 7 states, I show that the use of Vote By Mail produces an overall effect of a 10 percentage point increase in turnout across all types of elections. This finding is consistent with past research, which states that the increase in turnout occurs because Vote By Mail, similar to other "ease of voting" reforms, reduces the cost of voting. As an alternative hypothesis, I propose that the turnout increase from Vote By Mail is a more nuanced effect, moderated by the salience of a given election. I then organize these elections into low salience and high salience categories, and demonstrate that the turnout effect is more nuanced than previously thought. The implementation of Vote By Mail produces turnout effects that increase in magnitude as the salience of the election decreases, with a range from 3.4 percentage points increase in the high salience category of presidential general elections to an increase in turnout of 15 percentage points in the low salience category of local special elections. I then examine whether an increase in voter turnout results in an shift of the electorate's policy preferences. Comparing the outcomes of school bond measures in Vote By Mail elections with traditional elections, I show there is no statistically significant difference in the likelihood of passage of school bond measures. Furthermore, there is no statistically significant difference in percentage of "Yes" votes received on these measures. This analysis demonstrates that the increased turnout resulting from the use of Vote By Mail elections does not produce a shift in the policy preferences of the median voter.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Sarah Marie Sled.en_US
dc.format.extent84 leavesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectPolitical Science.en_US
dc.titleIt's in the mail : the effect of vote by mail balloting on voter turnout and policy outcomes in U.S. electionsen_US
dc.title.alternativeIt is in the mail : the effect of vote by mail balloting on voter turnout and policy outcomes in U.S. electionsen_US
dc.title.alternativeEffect of vote by mail balloting on voter turnout and policy outcomes in U.S. electionsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Political Science
dc.identifier.oclc426172518en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record