Login

A Framework for an HSI Downselection Tool

Show full item record




Title: A Framework for an HSI Downselection Tool
Author: Cunio, Phillip M.; Cummings, M. L.
Other Contributors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Humans and Automation Laboratory
Publisher: MIT Humans and Automation Laboratory
Issue Date: 2009
Abstract: This technical report describes the concept and development of SITHE, the Systems Integration Tool for HSI Evaluation. SITHE is a framework for selecting tools to be used in evaluating complex technical systems in terms of Human-Systems Integration, or HSI. HSI, or Human-Systems Integration, is the process of integrating people, technology, and an organization at a systems level, with full consideration given to the human requirements of the user (Booher, 2003). HSI focuses on the human aspects of system definition, development, and deployment, and integrates considerations related to personnel, training, human factors, habitability, and other human-related concerns into the overall systems acquisition process (US Department of Defense, 2004). HSI is a field of interest to researchers in academia and industry because, although systems continue to grow more complex, they have not achieved the level of autonomy that would permit them to operate successfully without humans either in or on the loop. Humans are still an essential component of most complex systems, especially when the context of operation for the complex system is subject to uncertainty, as in military applications. However, HSI as a broad field can encompass a large number of types of interaction between humans and systems, including but not necessarily limited to supervisory control, mechanics and ergonomics of control operation, and visualization and decision support. The universe of tools for HSI (including hardware, software, processes, and techniques used to evaluate HSI aspects of complex systems) is already large and growing quickly. Many HSI tools are developed for research purposes only, or in an ad-hoc fashion for specific projects, and as such there is no such thing as a standard catalogue of HSI tools. In addition, the need to consider downstream competencies such as flexibility, robustness, and usability, is increasing as HSI systems become more complex. Thus the HSI cost-benefit trade space is ever increasing, making it difficult for decision makers to determine if and to what degree a system actually meets some pre-specified HSI criteria.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/46746
Series/Report no.: HAL Reports;HAL2009-03

Files in this item

Files Size Format View Description
HAL2009-03.pdf 650.8Kb PDF View/Open HAL2009-03.pdf

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • HAL Reports
    Technical Reports Series - Humans and Automation Laboratory

Show full item record

Search DSpace@MIT


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Links