Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBradford H. Hager.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLawrence, Shawn A. (Shawn Adam), 1975-en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-28T15:43:46Z
dc.date.available2010-04-28T15:43:46Z
dc.date.copyright2003en_US
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/54506
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, 2003.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 43-59).en_US
dc.description.abstractI use a Global Positioning System (GPS) velocity field to constrain block models of the eastern Mediterranean and surrounding regions that account for the angular velocities of constituent blocks and elastic strain accumulation on block-bounding faults in the interseismic period. Kinematically consistent fault slip rates and locking depths are estimated by this method. Eleven blocks are considered, including the major plates, based largely on previous geodetic, seismic, and geologic studies: Eurasia (EU), Nubia (NU), Arabia (AR), Anatolia (AN), Caucasus (CA), South Aegea (AE), Central Greece (GR), North Aegea (NE), Southeast Aegea (SE), Macedonia (MA), and Adria (AD). Two models are presented, one in which the best-fitting locking depth for the entire region (-15 km) is used on all boundaries (Model A), and one in which shallower locking depths are used on the Marmara Fault, the Hellenic and Cyprus Arcs, and in the Greater Caucasus (Model B), based on a consideration of locally best-fitting locking depths. An additional block, Black Sea (BS), is postulated in a third model. The models are in fair to good agreement with the results of previous studies of plate motion, fault slip rates, seismic moment rates and paleomagnetic rotations. Notably, some block pairs in the Aegean region have Euler poles on, or near to, their common boundaries, in qualitative agreement with so-called pinned block models, e.g., for the transfer of slip from the right-lateral North Anatolian Fault system to a set of left-lateral and normal faults in central and northern Greece (McKenzie and Jackson, 1983; Taymaz et al., 1991a; Goldsworthy et al., 2002).en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) In addition, roughly three-quarters of the deformation in the Hellenic Arc and Greater Caucasus appears to be aseismic, in approximate agreement with previous studies (Jackson and McKenzie, 1988; Jackson, 1992). Increased data coverage will better constrain block motions, the locations of boundaries and the applicability of this method.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Shawn A. Lawrence.en_US
dc.format.extent89, F1-F18 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectEarth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences.en_US
dc.titleKinematically consistent, elastic block model for the eastern Mediterranean constrained by GPS measurementsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
dc.identifier.oclc55873744en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record