A comprehensive guide to the three biosimilar markets (Europe, US, Japan) and the regulatory pathways
Author(s)
Patrawala, Zeenat (Zeenat J.)
DownloadFull printable version (12.15Mb)
Other Contributors
Harvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology.
Advisor
Fiona Murray and Gary Pisano.
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Generics in the pharmaceutical industry have been instrumental in reducing overall healthcare cost and allowing for greater dispersal of life saving drugs to the general population. The Hatch-Waxman Act of 1984 played a critical role in changing the landscape of the pharmaceutical industry and providing legislation for an abbreviated regulatory pathway for generic drugs. The conversation has shifted to the need to implement similar regulatory paths for generics of biologics. First generation biologic patents have or are geared to expire within the next five years, providing a great opportunity for generic companies in this space to enter. Biologic generics, termed biosimilars or follow-on biologics, are more difficult to evaluate due to the complex nature of the molecule and the variables involved in the development and manufacturing process. This research seeks to understand the current debate in the biosimilar conversation, and examine whether there is a clear regulatory path to market for biosimilars using epoetin as a case example across the three main markets; US, Europe and Japan.
Description
Thesis (S.M.)--Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, 2010. Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. Includes bibliographical references (p. 57-59).
Date issued
2010Department
Harvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and TechnologyPublisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Keywords
Harvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology.