Advanced Search
DSpace@MIT

Devising seminars : getting to yesable options in difficult public disputes

Research and Teaching Output of the MIT Community

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Lawrence Susskind. en_US
dc.contributor.author Hulet, Carri en_US
dc.contributor.other Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning. en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2013-10-24T17:44:34Z
dc.date.available 2013-10-24T17:44:34Z
dc.date.copyright 2013 en_US
dc.date.issued 2013 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/81691
dc.description Thesis (M.C.P.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2013. en_US
dc.description Cataloged from PDF version of thesis. en_US
dc.description Includes bibliographical references (p. 44-45). en_US
dc.description.abstract For decades, collaboration practitioners have been experimenting with different methods to address "wicked problems" - social policy issues that are impossible to define, affect multiple stakeholders, and must be addressed even though they cannot be solved. One challenge with these difficult issues is generating a range of acceptable options to choose from before decisions are made or processes stalled. This thesis explores an experimental brainstorming method called a "Devising Seminar" to encourage creative option development among influential stakeholders in a private, facilitated setting. The product of the Devising Seminar is a non-attributed summary of the ideas the group generates that is made available to an audience beyond the participants. This method expands on the original Devising Seminar concept, which was first introduced by Roger Fisher at the Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School. Under the direction of Professor Lawrence Susskind, I managed the Action Research project that informs this thesis. In January 2013, our team of researchers from MIT, Harvard, Universidad Austral de Chile, and the Consensus Building Institute designed and ran an experimental Devising Seminar in Santiago on hydropower conflict in Chile. Representatives from industry, government, and civil society generated a set of options that they or other actors in the conflict could take to ease or resolve their disputes. Based on the research, I conclude that Devising Seminars have the potential to become a standard collaborative method for developing mutually-beneficial options for addressing wicked problems. I argue that stakeholders' potential unwillingness to engage in the creative process poses the biggest challenge to the method, and recommend possible actions that could mitigate the risk. I recommend further experimentation to test the method's effectiveness and impact. en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibility by Carri Hulet. en_US
dc.format.extent 73 p. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher Massachusetts Institute of Technology en_US
dc.rights M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. en_US
dc.rights.uri http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582 en_US
dc.subject Urban Studies and Planning. en_US
dc.title Devising seminars : getting to yesable options in difficult public disputes en_US
dc.title.alternative Getting to yesable options in difficult public disputes en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dc.description.degree M.C.P. en_US
dc.contributor.department Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning. en_US
dc.identifier.oclc 860805245 en_US


Files in this item

Name Size Format Description
860805245-MIT.pdf 17.51Mb PDF Full printable version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

MIT-Mirage