Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorGeorge Stiny.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWortmann, Thomas Aloisen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-18T17:34:45Z
dc.date.available2013-11-18T17:34:45Z
dc.date.copyright2013en_US
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/82166
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M. in Architecture Studies)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 2013.en_US
dc.descriptionThis electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from student-submitted PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 62-66).en_US
dc.description.abstractComputational design tools in architecture currently fall into two broad categories: Tools for representation and tools for generative design, including scripting. However, both categories address only relatively methodical aspects of designing, and do little to support the design freedom and serendipitous creativity that, for example, is afforded by iterative sketching. Calculating with visual rules provides an explicit notation for such artistic processes of seeing and drawing. Shape grammars have validated this approach by formalizing many existing designs and styles as visual rule-sets. In this way, visual rules store and transfer design knowledge. Visual calculating in a more general sense supports creativity by allowing a designer to apply any rule she wants, and to capriciously see and re-see the design. In contrast to other explicit design methodologies, visual calculating defines a decomposition into parts only after the design is calculated, thus allowing formalization without impeding design freedom. Located at the intersection between design and computation, the computer implementation of visual calculating presents an opportunity for more designerly computational design tools. Since parametric visual calculating affords the largest set of design possibilities, the computer implementation of parametric visual calculating will allow flexible, rule-based design tools that intelligently combine design freedom with computational processing power. In order to compute with shapes, a symbolic representation for shapes is necessary. This thesis examines several symbolic representations for shapes, including graphs. Especially close attention is given to graph-based representations, since graphs are well suited to represent parametric shapes. Based on this analysis, this thesis proposes a new graph for parametric shapes that is clearer, more compact and closer the original formulation of visual calculating than existing approaches, while also strongly supporting design freedom. The thesis provides algorithms and heuristics to construct this "inverted" graph, for connected and unconnected shapes.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Thomas Alois Wortmann.en_US
dc.format.extent66 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectArchitecture.en_US
dc.titleRepresenting shapes as graphs : a feasible approach for the computer implementation of parametric visual calculatingen_US
dc.title.alternativeFeasible approach for the computer implementation of parametric visual calculatingen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.in Architecture Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture
dc.identifier.oclc861229751en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record