Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMichael T. Laub.en_US
dc.contributor.authorModell, Joshua Wexleren_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biology.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-09T19:53:34Z
dc.date.available2014-01-09T19:53:34Z
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/83773
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Biology, 2013.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.en_US
dc.description.abstractAll cells must coordinate DNA replication with cell division in order to faithfully propagate whole chromosomes to daughter cells. During episodes of DNA damage, cells often delay division until the lesions have been repaired and replication has completed. The paradigm for the bacterial response to DNA damage is the transcriptional induction of "SOS" genes, and many organisms encode an SOS-induced cell division inhibitor. However, the mechanistic details of division inhibition are understood only in the y-proteobacterium E. coli, and it is unclear whether there are SOS-independent modes of division inhibition. I have studied the DNA damage response in the [alpha]-proteobacterium Caulobacter crescentus and identified two damage-induced cell division inhibitors. sidA is an SOS-induced division inhibitor whereas didA is induced in an SOS-independent fashion. Unlike most division inhibitors, SidA and DidA do not disrupt the localization of the cell division scaffold FtsZ or any other component of the cell division machinery or "divisome". Instead, SidA and DidA target the lateacting division proteins FtsW, FtsI, and FtsN to prevent divisome constriction, demonstrating that divisome components other than FtsZ can serve as regulatory targets. I have characterized mutations infts W andftsI which suppress the activities of both inhibitors, likely by causing cells to divide hyperactively. These results suggest that the FtsW/FtsI/FtsN subcomplex serves as an important regulatory node and may play an unexpected role in triggering divisome constriction in Caulobacter. I show that cells require at least one inhibitor to properly delay division following DNA damage, as cells lacking both inhibitors divide prematurely and suffer a viability defect in the presence of the DNA damaging agent mitomycin C (MMC). This finding suggests that some degree of redundancy exists within the Caulobacter response to MMC. Finally, I describe ongoing experiments which explore the origins of the SOS-independent induction of didA.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Joshua Wexler Modell.en_US
dc.format.extent145 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectBiology.en_US
dc.titleRegulatory pathways controlling cell division after DNA damage in Caulobacter crescentusen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biology
dc.identifier.oclc864895867en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record