Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCummings, M.l
dc.contributor.authorBrezezinski, A.
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-19T20:53:24Z
dc.date.available2014-05-19T20:53:24Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/87061
dc.description.abstractAs unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) become increasingly autonomous, time-critical and complex single-operator systems will require advance prediction and mitigation of schedule conflicts. However, actions that mitigate a current schedule conflict may create future schedule problems. Decision support is needed allowing an operator to evaluate different mission schedule management options in real-time. This paper describes two decision support visualisations for single-operator supervisory control of four independent UAVs performing a time-critical targeting mission. A configural display common to both visualisations, called StarVis, graphically depicts current schedule problems, as well as projections of potential local and global schedule problems. Results from an experiment showed that subjects using the locally optimal StarVis implementation had better performance, higher situational awareness, and no significant increase in workload over a more globally optimal implementation of StarVis. This research effort highlights how the same decision support design applied at different abstraction levels can produce different performance results.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was sponsored by Mitre, Inc.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherInternational Journal of Applied Decision Scienceen_US
dc.subjectmultiple unmanned aerial vehiclesen_US
dc.subjectsupervisory controlen_US
dc.subjectconfigural displaysen_US
dc.subjectdecision supporten_US
dc.subjectscheduleen_US
dc.subjectvisualisationen_US
dc.titleGlobal vs. local decision support for multiple independent UAV schedule managementen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationCummings, M.L., Brezezinski, A., Global vs. local decision support for multiple independent UAV schedule management, International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences - Vol. 3, No.3 pp. 188 - 205, 2010.en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • HAL Reports
    Technical Reports Series - Humans and Automation Laboratory

Show simple item record