Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorCarols E.S. Cesnik.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGuendel, Randal Edmund, 1975-en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2005-08-22T23:48:08Z
dc.date.available2005-08-22T23:48:08Z
dc.date.copyright2000en_US
dc.date.issued2000en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://theses.mit.edu/Dienst/UI/2.0/Describe/0018.mit.theses%2f2000-71en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/9246
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2000.en_US
dc.descriptionAlso available online at the MIT Theses Online homepage <http://thesis.mit.edu>.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 157-163).en_US
dc.description.abstractAeroelasticity is a critical issue in the design of aircraft and other aerospace vehicles, particularly those with highly flexible components. A reliable but efficient analysis tool is required to aid decision-making in the preliminary design phase. This thesis focuses on the unsteady aerodynamics component of the total aeroelastic system. Classically unsteady aerodynamics has been grounded on the Theodorsen function, which identifies the response of a 2-D wing section to harmonic pitch and plunge oscillations. Recently, however, the Aerodynamic Impulse Response has emerged, identifying a more fundamental aerodynamic response of a discrete-time system as that to a unit impulse. With this response, the response to any motion in the time domain can be easily predicted. This thesis examines the Aerodynamic Impulse Response method using an aerodynamic panel code, PMARC, to obtain impulse responses. The basic formulation of the method is limited to rigid-body analyses and is thus of limited use to aeroelastic studies. To this end, the method is extended to flexible-body responses by considering impulse distribution functions that are related to structural mode shapes of the body. Both linear and nonlinear responses are considered: the former uses convolution to generate arbitrary responses, the later the Volterra series. Linear results for both rigid and flexible bodies are encouraging. Predictions for a range of input motions closely match the unsteady response from PMARC for the same motion. However, for harmonic motion accuracy erodes for f [Delta] t < 0.05, limiting the frequency range over which the model is accurate. Nonlinear responses are erratic and further study is required.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Randal Edmund Guendel.en_US
dc.format.extent220 p.en_US
dc.format.extent17754877 bytes
dc.format.extent17754633 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://theses.mit.edu/Dienst/UI/2.0/Describe/0018.mit.theses%2f2000-71en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectAeronautics and Astronautics.en_US
dc.titleUnsteady aerodynamics for aeroelastic applications using the impulse response methoden_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
dc.identifier.oclc45536292en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record