Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRichard Roth and Frank R. Field, III.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWüstemeyer, Christophen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Materials Science and Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-05T15:57:57Z
dc.date.available2015-03-05T15:57:57Z
dc.date.copyright2014en_US
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/95870
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, 2014.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 95-99).en_US
dc.description.abstractDriven by rising environmental and geopolitical concerns, regulations have been put in place over the last decade to compel car makers to lower the CO2 emissions of their cars. Due to these increasingly stringent vehicle efficiency standards, considerable effort has been expended to reduce vehicle fuel consumption. Since the mass of the vehicle dominates all of these efforts, it can be argued that future emission requirements will be impossible to achieve with steel vehicle structures. A transition to lightweight, non-steel materials seems inevitable. However, non-steel materials in most cases require dedicated manufacturing systems due to specific manufacturing requirements. Thus, lightweight vehicle systems will require a distinct divergence between today's manufacturing environment and the potential future manufacturing system. While many studies have assessed greenfield production costs for conventional vehicles and the lightweight alternative, this research recognizes an important reality of the automobile marketplace: any future lightweight vehicle will be implemented out of a steel-based manufacturing environment. Carmakers will have to adapt existing plant infrastructure to the particular requirements of the non-ferrous material. This research develops a conceptual framework and a transition cost model to quantify change penalties of transition processes imposed on vehicle assembly systems. This transition model is applied to a case study provided by Ford Motor Company in order to better understand implications of different manufacturing strategies on the system's capability of switching materials. The research identifies three different manufacturing change penalties which have to be paid when switching the base material in vehicle assembly systems. Taking these penalties into account, case studies suggest when, to what extent, and how materials transitions can be realized most cost-effectively. Partial component-wise transitions are presented as an attractive alternative to full material transitions. Finally, strategies are proposed how to increase the material flexibility of automotive manufacturing systems.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Christoph Wüstemeyer.en_US
dc.format.extent102, [1] pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectMaterials Science and Engineering.en_US
dc.titleModeling design changes in vehicle assembly systems : platform transition strategies and manufacturing flexibilityen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Materials Science and Engineering
dc.identifier.oclc904293153en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record