Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorEzra Glenn.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVan Alstyne, Christopher Jen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-29T19:02:18Z
dc.date.available2015-09-29T19:02:18Z
dc.date.copyright2015en_US
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/99085
dc.descriptionThesis: M.C.P., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, 2015.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 85-88).en_US
dc.description.abstractWhen it comes to car size, the conventional wisdom of both auto manufacturers and drivers alike would dictate that smaller cars are designed for and work best in the tight confines of the city. Small cars-and specifically for this study, sub-compact 'city cars' such as the Smart Fortwodo indeed offer distinct advantages in terms of fuel efficiency, parking flexibility, increased visibility, as well as better maneuverability. However, empirical observations in the Boston Metropolitan Region finds little-if any-correlation with greater share of such vehicles in downtown settings as opposed to more suburban surroundings. Given the suggested advantages of these small cars, why don't they proliferate downtown? This study presents several possibilities, beginning with the likelihood that consumers apply a heavy discount to small vehicles as dictated by larger cultural values that may easily outweigh purely economic benefits. The study measures these economic benefits, employing an accounting-based methodology to calculate true long-term costs of driving, highlighting the compared costs of four car models: those of the Toyota Camry, Smart Fortwo, Smart Fortwo Electric, and the Nissan Leaf. Such a comparison illustrates the difficulty small cars face in expensive downtown settings such as Boston's; counterintuitively, the greater the number of costs that must be paid for by drivers-parking rates, tolls, congestion fees to name a few-the lower the comparative advantage often becomes for city cars and their like. On the other hand, if prices could be set to reflect real market conditions, especially in downtown areas where city cars are designed to excel, comparative economic advantages for these small cars grow quickly. This is particularly true for parking-should parking rates be charged in relation to how much space is actually used, city cars in particular could hold significant longterm economic advantage over larger options, a potential game-changer for urban mobility.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Christopher J. Van Alstyne.en_US
dc.format.extent88 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectUrban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.titleThe price isn't right : mobility alternatives and their plighten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.C.P.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
dc.identifier.oclc921892216en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record