Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRoger White.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Owain Rhysen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-03T21:06:30Z
dc.date.available2016-03-03T21:06:30Z
dc.date.copyright2015en_US
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/101522
dc.descriptionThesis: Ph. D. in Linguistics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2015.en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from PDF version of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 130-131).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis is about learning the preferences of humans from observations of their choices. It builds on work in economics and decision theory (e.g. utility theory, revealed preference, utilities over bundles), Machine Learning (inverse reinforcement learning), and cognitive science (theory of mind and inverse planning). Chapter 1 lays the conceptual groundwork for the thesis and introduces key challenges for learning preferences that motivate chapters 2 and 3. I adopt a technical definition of 'preference' that is appropriate for inferring preferences from choices. I consider what class of objects preferences should be defined over. I discuss the distinction between actual preferences and informed preferences and the distinction between basic/intrinsic and derived/instrumental preferences. Chapter 2 focuses on the challenge of human 'suboptimality'. A person's choices are a function of their beliefs and plans, as well as their preferences. If they have inaccurate beliefs or make inefficient plans, then it will generally be more difficult to infer their preferences from choices. It is also more difficult if some of their beliefs might be inaccurate and some of their plans might be inefficient. I develop models for learning the preferences of agents subject to false beliefs and to time inconsistency. I use probabilistic programming to provide a concise, extendable implementation of preference inference for suboptimal agents. Agents performing suboptimal sequential planning are represented as functional programs. Chapter 3 considers how preferences vary under different combinations (or &compositions') of outcomes. I use simple mathematical functional forms to model composition. These forms are standard in microeconomics, where the outcomes in question are quantities of goods or services. These goods may provide the same purpose (and be substitutes for one another). Alternatively, they may combine together to perform some useful function (as with complements). I implement Bayesian inference for learning the preferences of agents making choices between different combinations of goods. I compare this procedure to empirical data for two different applications.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Owain Rhys Evans.en_US
dc.format.extent131 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectLinguistics and Philosophy.en_US
dc.titleBayesian computational models for inferring preferencesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh. D. in Linguisticsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
dc.identifier.oclc939918144en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record