Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKaranfil, Ozge
dc.contributor.authorSterman, John
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-18T17:47:11Z
dc.date.available2016-03-18T17:47:11Z
dc.date.issued2015-08
dc.identifier.issn1748-5908
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/101748
dc.description.abstractImplications of widespread mammography screening remain controversial, and major health organizations in the US adopt different guidelines reflecting significant variations in actual practice. Literature suggests that implementation of routine screening over the past 30 years has incurred less benefit and more harms than is formerly believed.en_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-10-S1-A50en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceBioMed Centralen_US
dc.titleA dynamic model for health screening: misperceptions, feedback and long term trends in screening mammographyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationKaranfil, Ozge, and John D Sterman. “A Dynamic Model for Health Screening: Misperceptions, Feedback and Long Term Trends in Screening Mammography.” Implementation Sci 10, no. Suppl 1 (2015): A50.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Managementen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorKaranfil, Ozgeen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorSterman, Johnen_US
dc.relation.journalImplementation Scienceen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2016-03-18T08:51:41Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderKaranfil and Sterman.
dspace.orderedauthorsKaranfil, Ozge; Sterman, John Den_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7476-6760
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3532-9696
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record