Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorJames L. Wescoat Jr. and David M. Geltner.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKim, Sea Hoon.en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture.en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Real Estate. Program in Real Estate Development.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-15T22:03:25Z
dc.date.available2020-09-15T22:03:25Z
dc.date.copyright2020en_US
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/127554
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Architecture, May, 2020en_US
dc.descriptionThesis: S.M. in Real Estate Development, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Program in Real Estate Development in conjunction with the Center for Real Estate, May, 2020en_US
dc.descriptionCataloged from the official PDF of thesis.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 94-101).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis research proposes a conceptual and analytical framework for understanding technology-enabled infrastructure. Three strategies -creating new assets, layering uses and increasing utilization- are identified, which constitute technology-enabled infrastructure. The strategies are studied and analyzed through interviews and a case-based method. The cases discussed are Link NYC and BigBelly, both in contexts in New York City. These cases are evaluated using four lenses that are economic, social, environmental and user/urban experience. Variables are selected based on their pertinence to technology-enabled infrastructure, and they form the basis for understanding the intrinsic value of each case. These variables are public benefit, competition, physical, digital and social. Early findings indicate that creating and retaining ability to innovate throughout the lifespan of an infrastructure is a key element to technology-enabled infrastructure. To ensure a lasting success, the three strategies of infrastructure are recommended to be seen as a part of larger strategy, not as single or parallel strategies.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Sea Hoon Kim.en_US
dc.format.extent101 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsMIT theses may be protected by copyright. Please reuse MIT thesis content according to the MIT Libraries Permissions Policy, which is available through the URL provided.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectArchitecture.en_US
dc.subjectCenter for Real Estate. Program in Real Estate Development.en_US
dc.titleTechnology-enabled Infrastructure : analysis of its economics, public benefits and urban experienceen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.description.degreeS.M. in Real Estate Developmenten_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architectureen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Real Estate. Program in Real Estate Developmenten_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Real Estate
dc.identifier.oclc1193319421en_US
dc.description.collectionS.M. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Architectureen_US
dc.description.collectionS.M.inRealEstateDevelopment Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Program in Real Estate Development in conjunction with the Center for Real Estateen_US
dspace.imported2020-09-15T22:03:25Zen_US
mit.thesis.degreeMasteren_US
mit.thesis.departmentArchen_US
mit.thesis.departmentREDen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record