Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDahleh, Munther
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Ellie F.
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-11T14:18:06Z
dc.date.available2025-08-11T14:18:06Z
dc.date.issued2025-05
dc.date.submitted2025-06-16T14:46:23.907Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/162317
dc.description.abstractTools for problem specification in AI Decision making are underdeveloped at present. I propose two new tools for this purpose; first, a model of AI Decision Making, which supports problem identification and mitigation. Second, a Bill of Assumptions for Data Production. Data is an important component of AI Decision Making Systems, and data is necessarily produced by making a series of assumptions. My Bill of Assumptions for Data Production is a new approach to communicating these assumptions that facilitates collaboration, data transparency, and reduction of harmful bias. I illustrate this new approach by developing a dataset that estimates the distribution of Government education spending in the US across income deciles. My dataset informs existing Distributional National Accounts (DINA), which are a primary measure of income inequality in the US (Piketty et al., 2018). My estimate shows Government education spending is more progressive than assumed in current DINA. Furthermore, I show that removing federal education funding to postsecondary institutions would produce substantial harm.
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technology
dc.rightsIn Copyright - Educational Use Permitted
dc.rightsCopyright retained by author(s)
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/
dc.titleClarifying Decision Making Processes: Tools for Interdependency Modeling
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.degreeS.M.
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Data, Systems, and Society
mit.thesis.degreeMaster
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science in Technology and Policy


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record