| dc.contributor.advisor | Dahleh, Munther | |
| dc.contributor.author | Baker, Ellie F. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-08-11T14:18:06Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-08-11T14:18:06Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-05 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-06-16T14:46:23.907Z | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/162317 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Tools for problem specification in AI Decision making are underdeveloped at present. I propose two new tools for this purpose; first, a model of AI Decision Making, which supports problem identification and mitigation. Second, a Bill of Assumptions for Data Production. Data is an important component of AI Decision Making Systems, and data is necessarily produced by making a series of assumptions. My Bill of Assumptions for Data Production is a new approach to communicating these assumptions that facilitates collaboration, data transparency, and reduction of harmful bias. I illustrate this new approach by developing a dataset that estimates the distribution of Government education spending in the US across income deciles. My dataset informs existing Distributional National Accounts (DINA), which are a primary measure of income inequality in the US (Piketty et al., 2018). My estimate shows Government education spending is more progressive than assumed in current DINA. Furthermore, I show that removing federal education funding to postsecondary institutions would produce substantial harm. | |
| dc.publisher | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | |
| dc.rights | In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted | |
| dc.rights | Copyright retained by author(s) | |
| dc.rights.uri | https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/ | |
| dc.title | Clarifying Decision Making Processes: Tools for Interdependency Modeling | |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.description.degree | S.M. | |
| dc.contributor.department | Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Data, Systems, and Society | |
| mit.thesis.degree | Master | |
| thesis.degree.name | Master of Science in Technology and Policy | |