Repository logo
Log in(current)
Repository logoMIT Open ScholarshipDSpace@MIT
  1. Home
  2. MIT Open Access Articles
  3. MIT Open Access Articles
  4. Gender Composition of Labor Queues and Gender Disparities in Hiring

Gender Composition of Labor Queues and Gender Disparities in Hiring

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

Gender Composition of Labor Queues and Gender Disparities in Hiring.pdf

Description
Accepted version
Size

315.32 KB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (MD5)

6c72191686dce3e0b10834f27c2f1dfa

Author(s)
Campero, Santiago
•
Fernandez, Roberto M
Date Issued
June 1, 2019
Journal
Social Forces
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Citation
Santiago Campero, Roberto M Fernandez, Gender Composition of Labor Queues and Gender Disparities in Hiring, Social Forces, Volume 97, Issue 4, June 2019, Pages 1487–1516
Version
Author's final manuscript
Abstract
Sex segregation across jobs is widespread. While numerous studies have investigated how hiring contributes to this phenomenon, scholars disagree on how the gender composition of the set of candidates that firms consider (labor queues) is related to gender disparities in hiring. Theories of gendered organizations posit that organizations will tend to disadvantage females across all jobs, including jobs where females predominate. Other theories suggest that female disadvantage is more localized, and in particular that it is contingent on the sex-typing of the job. Tokenism theories posit that disparities are more acute when individuals are in the position of tokens among those being evaluated. Unique among papers in this area, we examine the relationship between the gender composition of labor queues and the degree of gender disparities in hiring using a sample of 441 firms in the hightech sector. Importantly, our setting allows us to distinguish between the predictions of theories of sex-typing and the influence of the numeric representation of women and men among those being evaluated (tokenism theories). Our main findings strongly support Kanter s token theory: screeners disadvantage both males and females when screening for positions in which candidates of the opposite gender predominate.
Terms of Use
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
Persistent DSpace Link
https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/166000
DOI of Published Version
10.1093/sf/soy097
Repository logo
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
Repository logo
Notify us about copyright concerns.