Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCurhan, Jared R.
dc.contributor.authorElfenbein, Hillary Anger
dc.contributor.authorXu, Heng
dc.date.accessioned2005-07-29T17:14:44Z
dc.date.available2005-07-29T17:14:44Z
dc.date.issued2005-07-29T17:14:44Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/18234
dc.description.abstractFour studies provide support for the development and validation of a framework for understanding the range of social psychological outcomes valued subjectively as consequences of negotiations. Study 1 inductively elicited and coded elements of subjective value among students, community members, and negotiation practitioners, revealing 20 categories that negotiation theorists in Study 2 sorted to reveal four underlying dimensions: Feelings about Instrumental Outcomes, the Self, Process, and Relationship. Study 3 proposed a new Subjective Value Inventory (SVI) questionnaire and confirmed its 4-factor structure, and Study 4 presents convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity data for this SVI. Results suggest the SVI is a promising tool to systematize and encourage research on the subjective outcomes of negotiation.en
dc.format.extent625467 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMIT Sloan School of Management Working Paperen
dc.relation.ispartofseries4544-05en
dc.subjectNegotiationen
dc.subjectsocial psychological outcomesen
dc.subjectsubjective valueen
dc.titleWhat do People Value when they Negotiate? Mapping the Domain of Subjective Value in Negotiationen
dc.typeWorking Paperen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record