Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBaughman, Martin Lynn
dc.contributor.authorJoskow, Paul L.
dc.contributor.authorZerhoot, Frederick S.
dc.date.accessioned2005-09-15T14:22:40Z
dc.date.available2005-09-15T14:22:40Z
dc.date.issued1974
dc.identifier.other02383003
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/27235
dc.description.abstractThe effects of alternative public policies on the consumption and prices of various forms of energy in the United States depends critically on the nature of consumer demands for fuels and the supply characteristics of these fuels. Previous work on energy demand has tended to concentrate on the demand for a particular fuel as determined by standard economic variables such as the price of the fuel, income levels, sometimes the price of alternative fuels, and other demographic characteristics of the consuming population. In this work the consumer decision making process is viewed as being composed of two steps. First, the consumer decides that he wants a particular service and, secondly, seeks to find the fuel that will provide this service most cheaply. This view leads us to concentrate on substitution possibilities among fuels for particular services rather than own-price elasticities for a particular fuel. This paper presents results for the determinants of energy consumption in the residential and commercial sector in the United States. First, a discussion of the conceptual model used for fuel choice decisions is presented. Then, empirical results are given for appliance choices in the residential sector for four selected appliances and for the "fuel-split" of aggregate energy consumption among the three fuels used in the residential and commercial sector. The own-price and cross-price elasticities are estimated and discussed. Next, the paper discusses the determinants of total energy demand in the residential and commercial sector and presents empirical results for a simple flow adjustment model. The long run price elasticity of total demand in this sector is estimated to be about -0.5 while the short run (one year) value is -0.15. Finally, the estimated relationships are used to make projections to 1980 for alternative price scenarios. These results show that significant consumption responses to changing fuel prices can be expected and, further, that some states are much more dramatically impacted than others.en
dc.format.extent4535561 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherMIT Energy Laben
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMIT-ELen
dc.relation.ispartofseries74-002en
dc.subjectEnergy policy in United Statesen
dc.titleInterfuel substitution in the consumption of energy in the United Statesen
dc.typeTechnical Reporten


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record