Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKoÄ í, Paul FrantiÅ¡ek
dc.contributor.authorGlicksman, Leon R.
dc.contributor.authorRohsenow, Warren Max
dc.date.accessioned2005-09-15T14:43:41Z
dc.date.available2005-09-15T14:43:41Z
dc.date.issued1974
dc.identifier.other02006895
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/27261
dc.descriptionForced cooling of underground electric power transmission lines, pt.4en
dc.description.abstractVarious pumping arrangements and their pressure profile control for forced cooling of long pipe type transmission lines were investigated. In order to overcome the extensive friction head losses and provide ample cable cooling, a number of pump stations has to be used. Since the inner line segments cannot be provided with pressure control head tanks, line blockages, flow resistance changes, flow rate changes, pump shutdowns, or other imbalances in one segment can alter the pressure profile along the entire line, and, when two head tanks are used, create transverse flow. Using experimental and analytical methods, it was determined that the pump - relief valve combination operating as a constant flow source is superior to the pump - relief valve combination operating as a constant pressure source, and that the configuration consisting of an even number of loops, each loop having the opposite flow direction from its neighbor's, is the best solution when operated with only one pressure control head tank. The simplest, and yet effective, line pressure profile control appears to be the pump bypass, which could be easily implemented on existing installations. The head tank pressure adjustment, however, is the most effective line pressure profile control scheme, and should be considered when a new system is being designed. From the analysis performed on an electric analogy model it was found, that the head tank pressure adjustment or the pump bypass would be sufficient to mainain the line pressure profile within its working limits for all practical imbalance sizes, and that, to extend the range of either of these line pressure profile controls, the emergency pump shutdown and the pump bypass itself should be based on the pump discharge, rather than the pump inlet pressure.en
dc.description.sponsorshipConsolidated Edison Co. of New Yorken
dc.format.extent4918938 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherMIT Energy Laben
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMIT-ELen
dc.relation.ispartofseries74-006en
dc.subjectUnderground electric lines -- Coolingen
dc.subjectPumping machineryen
dc.subjectElectric cablesen
dc.titleAnalysis of pumping systems for the cooling of underground transmission linesen
dc.typeTechnical Reporten


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record